The idea is that, since the government oversees the territory of the country, it has to be able to communicate with commercial entities operating at that territory, so the government requests can't just remain unanswered. Usually it's structured in a form of licensing, taxes or something like that.
So, if government needs, say, to learn about the owners of the property, why can't it suspend the use of the property - the government has means, like getting to the property - until the communications are established?
The proposal would be that lawyers would show up with papers. How they can prove they are representing the owners if it's the owners identity that's the question?
4 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 22.3 ms ] threadThe idea is that, since the government oversees the territory of the country, it has to be able to communicate with commercial entities operating at that territory, so the government requests can't just remain unanswered. Usually it's structured in a form of licensing, taxes or something like that.
So, if government needs, say, to learn about the owners of the property, why can't it suspend the use of the property - the government has means, like getting to the property - until the communications are established?
The proposal would be that lawyers would show up with papers. How they can prove they are representing the owners if it's the owners identity that's the question?