Long covid sucks for sure, but also seems to have a fairly broad definition. Some folks talk about it like it's permanent covid, but don't most people get better after a few months?
Look at the definition of long covid from a legit source of your chosing and come back and tell me I'm wrong. Even the article cites it at "a few months to a few years". By definition, if you feel a little woozy a few months after infection, you have long covid. Nothing I've said is misinformation.
The absolute shit show that was the brunt (thus far) of the covid pandemic has me wondering which of these "legit sources" deserve my trust. This is not to say that they are all malicious but when looking at all of the the expert opinion doled out during that time, there seems to be a really high occurrence of failure.
Well this is somewhat terrifying, the idea that long COVID (as opposed to “post COVID”, as described in the article) is actually something like an early stage neural degenerative disorder.
How is covid surging? There are 58 cases in the 7 day rolling average for sf. There are 3/4 of a million people in SF. More people are fucking in robotaxis than getting covid
8 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 34.9 ms ] threadStop relying on what you heard and just LOOK IT UP from a legit source. And stop repeating misinformation.
Edit: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects/...
Yeesh.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-022-00846-2