76 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 185 ms ] thread
Save the planet and ruin your health with ultra-processed food.
well still better than both ruining the planet and health with animal based processed food.
I'd wager $20 that the carbon Footprint of this thing is much higher than a farm raised (not factory raised) real chunk of meat.
It's not.
Got any proof?

I'm skeptical, because many things, like Corn Ethanol, are actually not what they're promised to be. I would love it if this wasn't the case here, but I suspect it is.

Any proof either way?

Updated- the guy above provided a bunch, thanks!

> I'd wager $20 that the carbon Footprint of this thing is much higher than a farm raised (not factory raised) real chunk of meat.

Thanks? And you think you'll get away with that? ;)

> a farm raised (not factory raised) real chunk of meat

Farm raised is in fact worse for the climate than CAFOs (because it takes longer), not talking about other aspects.

> I'd wager $20

Just joking, of course. Try some good vegan restaurant instead (happycow.net).

I was actually raised vegetarian and generally prefer vegetarian dishes.

I've also been paying attention, and know that many things that are sold to us as greener, arent.

> I was actually raised vegetarian and generally prefer vegetarian dishes.

If you've been raised vegetarian, it's possible you have some blind spots. A lot of people have an idealized picture of how the industry works.

Have you seen "dairy is scary" ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcN7SGGoCNI

Or dominion? https://www.dominionmovement.com/watch

> know that many things that are sold to us as greener, arent

Certainly, that's why I would recommend focusing on science rather than mass or social media.

How so? Meat already has a much higher carbon footprint so what part of the plant based product would make it so much higher?
The manufacturing and distribution.

It's like with corn based ethanol fuels. Yes, we can turn corn into fuel. Yes, it takes more fuel to burn than we get out of the process.

https://sentientmedia.org/new-study-confirms-plant-based-bet...

A new University of Oxford study adds to the growing body of evidence that plant-based foods, even the processed ones, are better for the planet than meat, especially beef and lamb.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2120584119

Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jul/07/plant-ba...

Plant-based meat by far the best climate investment, report finds

https://css.umich.edu/publications/research-publications/bey...

Beyond Meat's Beyond Burger Life Cycle Assessment: A detailed comparison between a plant-based and an animal-based protein source

the Beyond Burger generates 90% less greenhouse gas emissions, requires 46% less energy, has >99% less impact on water scarcity and 93% less impact on land use than a ¼ pound of U.S. beef

https://ourworldindata.org/food-choice-vs-eating-local

You want to reduce the carbon footprint of your food? Focus on what you eat, not whether your food is local ... Transport is a small contributor to emissions. For most food products, it accounts for less than 10%, and it’s much smaller for the largest GHG emitters. In beef from beef herds, it’s 0.5%.

What's the carbon footprint of the manufacturing? Meat is also distributed.

What's your source for this claim about ethanol fuels? You can get pure ethanol at any pump in Brazil, it's widely used, and it's even 10% in gasoline. You sure they are losing money on that?

https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-corn-based-e...

It's the same for the sugar cane based ethanol made in other countries.

Can you answer the question about the carbon footprint of manufacturing plant based foods?

The study on corn ethanol looks so-so, however it's only one study and has a lot of disclaimers about possible problems in methodology. They claim the difference could be as low as zero and as high as 24%. They also are quite strong in saying biofuels must be a part of managing carbon. Just that we need something more efficient than corn. And some scientists have already found problems with the study.[1]

As far as the numbers being the same for sugar cane, that's completely wrong. It produces close to double the fuel.

[1] https://growthenergy.org/2022/05/25/doe-scientists-release-c...

(comment deleted)
[flagged]
(comment deleted)
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

We're particularly trying to avoid ideological battle here, regardless of which ideology people are battling for or against.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

I don't get this. The best veggie burger in my town doesn't taste anything like meat. Make more good, novel veggie products, not "realistic bones".

Oh, and try to make them healthy, unlike Impossible burgers.

Next up: plant based roast boar's head, complete with eyeballs.

I personally have a soft spot for halliumi. Best burger I've ever had was from a street market in Glasgow.
Does the veggie burger in your town fit inside a bun and stay inside the bun or does it fall apart immediately when you start eating it?

I’ve had thousands of veggie burgers and most lack stability unfortunately

I admit it isn't the most stable, but it was manageable. And the taste made up for it.
I’ve had the same problem with most veggie burgers, but found a recipe years ago that really holds up. It’s a Jamaican Ital recipe: https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2005/05/26/bean-burgers-jamaica...

Coincidentally I just got back from Jamaica a few days ago, and as a vegetarian I always try to find the Rasta spot as soon as I can as they’re usually the ones with the best veg food. I was thinking of these burgers and now here we are — I guess I should make a batch this weekend!

I think I would have quit after the first couple. Don’t need thousands of examples to figure out it isn’t working.
I usually wound up eating them with a knife and fork but still often the best vegetarian thing I could find to eat when I was traveling.
there's a market for both
For people who are considering vegetarianism for environmental or health reasons, it's important to be able to say "You don't have to go without."

Yes, there are a billion lovely things you can do with vegetables, but sometimes people are looking for a specific known quantity. Maybe it's a "food as a nostalgia/cultural heritage" thing-- you always had a hot dog when you went to the baseball game, now you can still get a Beyond Sausage. Maybe it's not yet being adventurous enough to try a meatless dish that stands on its own. Maybe it's trying to cater to an entire family, where other family members are eating meat and you want to provide something they'll be comfortable with.

Even outside of the attempt to emulate meat, I give them credit for experimenting, because it expands the culinary vocabulary. Maybe those "realistic bones" can be used as part of an entirely novel dish to add texture or change how the cooking cycle progresses.

But the thing is ribs are just about one of the hardest things to emulate, so all that's going to happen is they'll fail and put people off meat alternatives.

I'd rather they focus on things that stand a chance of actually being good alternatives.

It's not either/or. There are many plant-based meat companies with lots of different products.
It's not an either or, but development time and budget is limited.

Plus if you hype something and the product doesn't live up to the hype, it damages the market.

These are good points. I'll take back some of the things I said about them. :)
Meat eaters won’t eat less meat unless it is without much sacrifice. This product is intended for meat eaters trying to be vegetarian.
(comment deleted)
Agreed. I'm an unapologetic meat eater, and I'll never eat faux meat crap, especially when it's just some inferior copy of the real thing. But there are plenty of things that don't have meat in them that are good to eat- someone else mentioned halloumi, lots of Indian food and Japanese food, etc. It's the perennial "running for the leader of the opposition" problem. Focus on making something good, not on an inferior substitute for something that's already there.
It's like how almond milk is really good, but only if you don't try to pretend that it's cow milk.
This ignores the reality that many people are attached to eating meat and all of the familiar things that come along with it. For many, the realistic simulations of meat are the first step toward adopting plant-based alternatives. It's also likely that cultivated ("lab-grown") meat is going to be more popular than plant-based when it reaches a similar price point to conventionally grown meat.

I would say that the primary goal is to reduce the animal suffering and environmental damages caused by animal agriculture. Healthier varieties of plant-based products are a good thing too, but it's less important which products people are switching to, as long as they're switching away from factory farming.

> the realistic simulations of meat

There is no such thing.

Some of them are getting pretty close, to the point that people choose them over real meat in blind taste tests.

Even if we never get to a perfect simulation of meat, the ethical and environmental reasons for avoiding factory farming far outweigh whatever marginal pleasure you might get from it.

‘marginal’? Quite a leap there.
Well... some people think whatever they eat at KFC is real poultry. I can understand how these people can be fooled. But for some of us lucky enough to eat the chicken we raised... this leap looks like the grand Canyon.
(comment deleted)
> whatever marginal pleasure you might get from it.

Ummmm, like much needed protein? Source of B12?

When true vat meat is a thing, I'll get it. But I've never tasted a realistic simulation of meat. The closest I think I've seen is plant based hot dogs, but it's still a miss.
So, basically the McRib?
(comment deleted)
No, thanks. If we are to only eat fruits and vegetables, I'd rather cook them myself than eat some fake industrial processed shit.
As an ethical-vegetarian, these are very much not for me, but I've also noticed this weird thing where some restaurants (Sushirrito's the most recent one I've seen) drop their traditionally meat free items and replace it with something that is just a meat item with the meat subbed out.

I get why they want to do this for streamlining purposes, but it doesn't make any sense to me. People that want to avoid eating meat will still avoid it, but also the differences need to be taken into account regarding texture and seasoning, which it doesn't seem like they do.

Same - I see that quite a lot around traditional Polish restaurants. Polish cousine already has a lot of meat-free dishes, a lot of it borne from the times of difficulty and learning to make do with very little, so it's completely normal to order a dish that just doesn't happen to have any meat in it, and no one would even think of it as specifically vegetarian/vegan(even though it is). But now those dishes are being pushed out for specific vegetarian/vegan dishes where a traditional dish with meat is being replaced with a meat-imitation. It's like......why? If you want vegetarian dumplings(pierogi), there are literally dozens of different options already, we've been making them literally for centuries, but you'd rather have pierogi with meat-imitation pork mince? I mean suit yourself, but it's just weird.
One of the greatest things on Earth, cheese and potato pelmeni/pierogi, steamed and then lightly pan fried in butter (or oil) with onions. Serve with smetana and anything else you like.

I could eat that for DAYS. No meat required, no pretensions of meat required!

What’s the nutritional and health verdict on the fake meat products generally so far? Seems like we’re encouraging people to replace the least processed part of their diet with something completely processed. That seems like a bad idea and it seems like the kind of thing we’re going to really regret in 100 years when we trace back a load of diseases to it. This is just a gut feeling though - is there any research?
I don't think a lot of health claims are made about these, it's either an ecological argument, a moral (killing animals is bad) argument, or both. After all I think we all understand that it's more than possible to reduce or eliminate meat without having to eat highly processed frankenfood recreations of meat. I'd be much happier eating foods that make the best of non-meat ingredients without trying to imitate the taste and texture of something it just... isn't.

A black bean "burger" can be a joy, a greasy Beyond Burger is never a good time. If I really want the experience of a hamburger, no amount of TVP and coconut oil is going to replicate that experience anyway.

The worst part about this is that many places that I used to eat at have replaced their delicious black bean burgers with impossible meat.

I am not a vegetarian or vegan, but I used to love the vegetarian options and would often opt for things such as a black bean or portobello burger.

Now I just get a regular burger.

I wouldn't really call this completely processes. It's just soy flour mechanically processed with some seasoning. I'd put it into the same category as fish sticks or chicken nuggets. Not something I would eat every day, but if someone wants to do it, they'll be fine.
...Fish sticks and chicken nuggets are some of the more iconic "highly processed foods" out there though? And think about it, "just soy flour with seasoning" sure, but what about the "meat" on the bones? That's going to be soy flour and a mixture of saturated and unsaturated fats, binders, textural elements, seasoning, thickeners and so on.

Basically the soy-flour bones are just one additional element, it's not like people are going to be buying them on their own, they'd realize that they're just seasoned dog treats.

Oh no, some fats and fibers.
I can't think of anything that is more processed than fish sticks or chicken nuggets.
So blending a fish and pressing it back together with some flour is the most processed thing you can think of? If that's the case, maybe there is nothing wrong with processed foods.
A lot of plant-based meat substitutes are effectively a very dense/high-protein (gluten) bread loaf. Not excessively exotic or processed compared to other common foods.
I just can't wrap my head around the idea of the process to eat these.

So first you cook them traditionally or at least close. Then you serve and eat them.

And next you have some left over bones. Which you need to bake or fry? Like why even bother to combine things like that?

And then, considering if they are shared. And someone eat them by hand and suck from the bone, you still want to mix them together, bake/fry and eat? It sounds kinda yucky...

It also doesn’t make sense because meat eaters don’t eat the pork bones, so it’s not as if anyone feels like they are missing out on edible bones and want to substitute for this.
Nobody wants this crap. If you want to sell a product it needs to be good to begin with.

Ethics, economics, politics, etc. will always be secondary to even the most fanatical customers. If the product sucks, it sucks.

> Nobody wants this crap.

That remains to be seen. In my view the more vegetarian options and ease of access, the better.

I've had a lot of plant-based drumsticks with edible sugar-cane "bone". Kind of fun to eat!
Well, I for one won't be convinced until I can hunt the whole Tofu-de-beast.