In my opinion, this guy is highly unethical and really should be locked up. First off, what he is doing is illegal (vigilantism, invasion of privacy and computer fraud/abuse) and even if it isn't, he is still tampering with evidence.
I am also very disturbed by the fact that he 'only targets bad-guys' and that the definition of 'bad-guys' is his own decision. Is the guy that bullied him at high school on there? What if he makes a typo and hits someone else?
Although reading a lot of what he says, he sounds like someone that read a couple security blogs and is just regurgitating things he read without knowing what he is saying all so that he can play at 'Patriotic Super hero'
1 comment
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 12.0 ms ] threadIn my opinion, this guy is highly unethical and really should be locked up. First off, what he is doing is illegal (vigilantism, invasion of privacy and computer fraud/abuse) and even if it isn't, he is still tampering with evidence.
I am also very disturbed by the fact that he 'only targets bad-guys' and that the definition of 'bad-guys' is his own decision. Is the guy that bullied him at high school on there? What if he makes a typo and hits someone else?
Although reading a lot of what he says, he sounds like someone that read a couple security blogs and is just regurgitating things he read without knowing what he is saying all so that he can play at 'Patriotic Super hero'