Show HN: MoodMinder – Swift Anger Regulation for Better Emotional Well-Being (moodminder-34552.bubbleapps.io)
Hey Hacker News community! We're excited to showcase MoodMinder, a mental health app MVP that empowers individuals to swiftly regulate anger and enhance emotional well-being. MoodMinder was born out of a desire to provide quick anger regulation solutions for busy individuals.
Unique Features:
Rapid Mood Identification: Identify anger triggers and tension levels swiftly.
Instant Personalized meditations: Receive tailored meditations for immediate anger control.
Cognitive Reappraisal: Shift perspectives to defuse triggers in real-time.
Quick Interactive Games: Engage in games designed for anger regulation in just minutes.
As an MVP, we're seeking insights from the Hacker News community to shape our app's development. Your feedback is pivotal. Thank you for being part of our journey!
30 comments
[ 1.6 ms ] story [ 79.3 ms ] threadAt the core of MoodMinder is a conceptual cognitive model, meticulously crafted to regulate emotions. Emotions are a central pillar of this model, as they significantly influence our perception and interactions with the world. To test and validate our model, we've integrated the power of GPT into our framework. We utilize GPT's remarkable ability to understand and generate human-like text and a game to customize our training process. This synergy empowers MoodMinder to fine-tune its emotional intelligence. As we continue to enhance MoodMinder's capabilities, the fine-tuning of GPT remains a pivotal step. This process ensures that the model aligns even more closely with the nuances of human emotions, creating a symbiotic relationship between AI and human emotion understanding. Thank you for your interest in our journey! We're excited to have you accompany us as we explore the fascinating landscape of emotions through technology.
GPT can be useful for editing purposes, esp. for people writing in their second language or trying to find a more concise way of expressing themselves. (I'd often throw a phrase at GPT to see if it feels natural/idiomatic, instead of bothering my better half - an editor)
Having said that, if your goal was to make the responses here (on HN) more personalised, you achieved the opposite. Perhaps this is a sign of my personal paranoia, but I'm still not sure if I'm talking to a person or a bot. I don't mean to sound harsh, just thought it might be useful for you to know.
(FYI, I meant the responses here on HN. )
Your comments lack empathy and you aren't "reading the room" at all.
This is totally off-brand and sleazy if you're selling mental health advice. Particularly the fact that your responses don't demonstrate natural emotional variation, when you are literally selling a tool to help with emotion modulation.
From another language: “Translate this to English. Provide any clues you can get from idiosyncrasies in spelling, grammar, or word choice which might indicate which specific region or sub-culture the writer might be from and use this to provide notes on deeper or alternate meanings specific to that region or sub-culture. Note any potential ambiguities or uncertainties in translation and provide multiple options where appropriate. Use context clues to explain the tone, tenor, and emotion of the writing/writer, and what that commonly means in this culture vs. American culture.”
To another language: “Translate this to $LANGUAGE. Please make it sound natural to a native speaker, use local idioms or phrases wherever possible. Rather than strictly transliterating it, focus on conveying the specific tone of the original, but note where there may be a conflict between cultures and inform me if there’s a risk of being misinterpreted.”
hth
Also needs privacy statement about how data is handled. And with regards to what is sent to open AI.
I wouldn’t use this at all. There are 3+ entities (bubble, bubbles infra, openai, yourself) with access to super sensitive information about me, people I know etc.
Yes, you do. You state on the front page that this is built on ChatGPT.
Edit: I liked the explanation provided by someone else in this thread that you have already replied to, so you can disregard this comment.
I have major concerns about the scope of what is fed to ChatGPT vs. GPT-4 API. I am also concerned by knee-jerk reactions here which take minimum action that seems to continue to focus around formal PII without an introspective review of customers real concerns, which is the totality of personal info likely to be shared with your service and how that’s handled and treated.
This isn’t written for you — I worry if you respond at all you’ll send a generic imitation of corpo-speak “We respect your views and we’re working on it!”. This is written to others, to provide a jumping off point to discuss what makes this style of communication stand out so much, and what signals it provides customers vs. what signals it provides investors.