I'm surprised this wasn't posted yet. Personally I though it was a pretty shitty list. Fewer serious researchers, more ethics and regulation hangers on, various has-beens, all carefully balanced according to irrelevant personal traits.
And Georgi Gerganov wasn't on there so it has no credibility. It tells you everything you need to know, they went out of their way to tick some boxes and get some stereotypes with asymmetrical haircuts but missed a legit top ten most influential person.
I suppose all lists like this are very subjective, but this one is lame.
3 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 37.0 ms ] threadAnd Georgi Gerganov wasn't on there so it has no credibility. It tells you everything you need to know, they went out of their way to tick some boxes and get some stereotypes with asymmetrical haircuts but missed a legit top ten most influential person.
I suppose all lists like this are very subjective, but this one is lame.