What if Bitcoin became popular despite the fact that it was based on blockchain rather than because of it? What if blockchain is a technical fail that's going to join things like NoSQL in the ash heap?
Haypenny is digital currency done the right way. Because of that, it's fast, secure, private, and it's far easier to use for average consumers.
That %3 or whatever number it's, can be part of higher % of your userbase and developers. But at least founders of this thing can't develop. That's certain for now. DOA.
Nobody uses Bitcoin that way--everybody uses the very centralized and very identified brokerages like Binance to actually buy and sell it. The libertarian fantasies of "currency without governments" never materialized nor will it.
Bitcoin will always be just another speculation instrument because it's too slow and too expensive to used for any other purpose. The reason is this useless religious garbage called "blockchain".
12 comments
[ 1.7 ms ] story [ 35.6 ms ] threadHaypenny is digital currency done the right way. Because of that, it's fast, secure, private, and it's far easier to use for average consumers.
Firefox is not supported?
That's a hard no.
I briefly scanned through the whitepaper at:
https://haypenny.net/whitepaper.html
but couldn't find how it solved the Byzantine General's problem, transacting without a need for trust.
Bitcoin will always be just another speculation instrument because it's too slow and too expensive to used for any other purpose. The reason is this useless religious garbage called "blockchain".