13 comments

[ 2.3 ms ] story [ 51.6 ms ] thread
If only they put so much effort into rescuing humans who put their lives at risk to assist them.
exactly. what a weird PR campaign.
I don't know the context for the comment.

Have they not rescued more humans than 30 dogs rescued who assisted them?

Too bad they didn’t have this level of concern for Afghan translators and other people who helped them who were left to fend for themselves when the Taliban took over.
Or all the service (err, "contract") dogs abandoned in cages in Afghanistan.

It was gross seeing that "fact checked" at the time as false because they were "contract" dogs instead of official service dogs. They still left them...

Fact checkers serve the establishment, they aren't doing it for you
Good thing it was the CIA, ATF would have just shot them dead
I bet some people are disappointed the reactions here are so negative, but you shouldn't be. I think it's warranted considering what the CIA has also done in the middle east.
Don't forget South America. The CIA is a scourge to the world
What an odd feel-good piece for cia.gov. I will put on my tinfoil hat and wait for the scandal to follow. CIA abusing dogs for <whatever>, news at 11, I presume.
what about cows, no love for them? pigs are smarter then dogs too yet we slaughter them