tl,dr: "So what you end up with in the 24, it’s a bit of a ‘Goldilocks moment’ of you get all of the extra dynamic range that comes from the 12 and the detail transfer that comes in from the 48.”
So the 48mp sensor runs in cropped 12mp while doing some type of exposure bracketing before the user takes a photo, then when the photo is taken the sensor is cropped to 24mp. At that point post-processing combines all images together?
It's really misleading to describe any of the fake focal lengths as "prime lenses". All of the iPhones lenses are technically prime lenses, but the new focal lengths are just digital zoom with some extra post processing.
It's not part of the optics (since you can't move the lightwells) but I think it's still part of the analog system, so it's different from working on pixel or Bayer values.
If you reconfigure the sensor without cropping you do not end up with a zoomed image, just with a reduced resolution one. With a fixed focal length in order to zoom you need to decrease the sensor size, therefore cropping, so digital zoom
aaah interesting. Then the resolution is increased, but how does it affect the overall image quality since you have the same amount of photons in more wells ?
12MP can capture incredible amounts of detail when your sensor is big and your lens is good, and especially if you don't have a Optical Low-Pass Filter, which literally blurs your images:
They also advertised that the sensor in the 15 pro is a 'larger 48mp sensor' which isn't true: it's the SAME EXACT sensor as last years 14 pro, its just larger than the regular 15. Tech journalists need to start calling this out more.
They should make the phone the same thickness as the lenses, have a nice 6000mAh battery size and a high powered headphone jack. Maybe then the phone will lie flat on a table.
A few years ago, iPhones reached high-end Androids in battery capacity. Had an excellent gaming Huawei phone that lasted two days with normal usage, and IIRC the iPhone 11/12 were the ones who started having comparable battery life. Nowadays, as a tourist camera, a Pro Max barely lasts half a day, continuously overheating by who knows what AI processing out of the user's control.
The bump annoys me heatedly because it means that the phone don’t sit flat, and even a vibrate can send it falling off the edge of table, or the arm of a chair.
Fine, keep throwing your money at a brand that sells phones that annoy you heatedly, thus encouraging them to make more phones with bulky lenses that you hate.
Apple wants to keep an uncluttered experience and will rely on app developers in order to give power users more. McCormack points to this as the fine line that Apple is looking to walk: give the features but leave it to developers to service those who want to push the hardware and software to its max.
I’m keen to see the results when people get their hands on these phones. I own one of the last iPhones which can save non-HDR shots when using the default camera app. I set it up to save both, but the vast majority of the time I prefer the non-HDR photo as it usually has more contrast and captures the scene more accurately. I was really disappointed when Apple removed this option on newer iPhones, and even more disappointed when I saw how much they also jacked up the post processing on the 14 Pro. Yeah, the cameras may be better, but good lord the processing is absolutely awful to my eyes. I don’t really want to use apps like Halide because in typical Apple fashion, you can’t change the default camera app (which I use a lot, as it’s accessible without unlocking the phone, which is important as FaceID rarely works for me when I’m outside). Unfortunately my phone is dying so I’m just hoping they’ve dialled in the processing for the 48mp sensor.
For people that care about the quality of footage above anything else you can already record better quality footage with a $200 Android phone. You can record RAW video with an app I wrote (it's free for the raw video part of anyone cares). Every year every phone manufacturer claims to do the next best thing with video and photography and every year it's fairly mediocre. I'll wait to test it for myself as always.
You could do that five years ago. Apple is ridiculously behind the state of the art, although firmly entrenched in its walled garden. For all its fanfare and marketing, the "Wonderlust" presentation was incredibly underwhelming, just tiny increments, and more artificial market segmentation.
25 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 63.0 ms ] threadAnd shooting at 48mp HEIF does not do this.
When sensors with microlense arrays become more common things will definitely become more complicated tho.
We’re probably about 5 years from consumer grade MLA sensors still tho.
https://petapixel.com/what-is-a-low-pass-filter/
They also advertised that the sensor in the 15 pro is a 'larger 48mp sensor' which isn't true: it's the SAME EXACT sensor as last years 14 pro, its just larger than the regular 15. Tech journalists need to start calling this out more.
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/2668153890/apple-s-iphone-...
Sigh.
Apple wants to keep an uncluttered experience and will rely on app developers in order to give power users more. McCormack points to this as the fine line that Apple is looking to walk: give the features but leave it to developers to service those who want to push the hardware and software to its max.