Does anyone know what they mean by a "grid"? Different neurons can have different numbers of connections and they connect all over the place, not just to their immediate neighbors.
I read and reread the first page of this paper and I can't figure out what they're saying. What's new here?
I'm no domain expert, but I think by talking about individual neurons your comment is focused a bit too spatially small. The pathways described in the paper involve numerous axons hooking up widely separated neuron sets.
I.e. for a computer analogy, this isn't showing the scale of internal wiring for a chip, or even cables on the scale of hooking the motherboard to a hdd. It is showing the wiring on the scale of 'from one rack in a sever room to another across the room'. Or, for a highway analogy, not the housing subdivisions, more the freeways.
I haven't completely read it, but that data looks more noisy than that medical express link. That makes me trust it more. I (did?) wonder whether Science would do April fool's jokes, or whether the authors made a deal to do so, with the article itself being real.
9 comments
[ 4.8 ms ] story [ 43.8 ms ] threadA bit more on diffusion imaging, though you'll have to hit google scholar to find more up-to-date information on the signal processing:
http://www.metafilter.com/114373/What-a-beautiful-mind-you-h...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_MRI
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tractography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cray-3_processor_brick.jpg
I read and reread the first page of this paper and I can't figure out what they're saying. What's new here?
I.e. for a computer analogy, this isn't showing the scale of internal wiring for a chip, or even cables on the scale of hooking the motherboard to a hdd. It is showing the wiring on the scale of 'from one rack in a sever room to another across the room'. Or, for a highway analogy, not the housing subdivisions, more the freeways.
I just got answered over on reddit by someone who did a thesis on tractography; they seem to be open to more questions: http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/rl1y7/diffusion_spe...
I haven't completely read it, but that data looks more noisy than that medical express link. That makes me trust it more. I (did?) wonder whether Science would do April fool's jokes, or whether the authors made a deal to do so, with the article itself being real.