Funny, it’s never the independent researchers drawing these conclusions, rather it’s always something like The Institute Of Investigating Whether 5G Horses Are Harming Your Children.
1. There is no conclusive or even suggestive evidence that radio waves cause adverse health effects in humans.
2. There is no known biological pathway by which radio waves could cause adverse health effects in humans.
Let me know when a legitimate study performed by known scientists in a reputable journal proves either of these statements wrong. Until then, I’m not worried.
>> There is no conclusive or even suggestive evidence that radio waves cause adverse health effects in humans.
Only if you listen to mainstream "science".
>> There is no known biological pathway by which radio waves could cause adverse health effects in humans.
You sure?
>> In confronting of the tissue with the cell phone, the temperature was increased by 0.53°C in the 2 mm thickness that is the gray matter of the brain, increased by 0.99°C in the 12 mm thickness, and also increased by 0.92°C in the 22 mm thickness. Brain temperature showed higher rates than the base temperature after 15 min of confrontation with cell phone waves in all the three thicknesses.
So obviously cell phone radiation DOES in fact interact with the brain tissue. Heat is simply the only thing that we can measure easily in a living human with modern technology.
No one yet knows what this does on the long term or eg to the skin which is blasted by 5G radiation now whenever you leave the house.
Your own house acts as a major radiation shield to a large degree.
I won’t comment on radiation levels and the impact on the body.
But the USA uses a standard head size for testing exposure which is based on something like a US soldier from the 70s and does not account for smaller heads IIRC.
5 comments
[ 0.22 ms ] story [ 24.5 ms ] thread1. There is no conclusive or even suggestive evidence that radio waves cause adverse health effects in humans.
2. There is no known biological pathway by which radio waves could cause adverse health effects in humans.
Let me know when a legitimate study performed by known scientists in a reputable journal proves either of these statements wrong. Until then, I’m not worried.
Only if you listen to mainstream "science".
>> There is no known biological pathway by which radio waves could cause adverse health effects in humans.
You sure?
>> In confronting of the tissue with the cell phone, the temperature was increased by 0.53°C in the 2 mm thickness that is the gray matter of the brain, increased by 0.99°C in the 12 mm thickness, and also increased by 0.92°C in the 22 mm thickness. Brain temperature showed higher rates than the base temperature after 15 min of confrontation with cell phone waves in all the three thicknesses.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952570/
So obviously cell phone radiation DOES in fact interact with the brain tissue. Heat is simply the only thing that we can measure easily in a living human with modern technology.
No one yet knows what this does on the long term or eg to the skin which is blasted by 5G radiation now whenever you leave the house.
Your own house acts as a major radiation shield to a large degree.
That's like asking someone to point out that problematic bits of hay in the giant pile of horseshit. It's all horseshit.
But the USA uses a standard head size for testing exposure which is based on something like a US soldier from the 70s and does not account for smaller heads IIRC.