MIT CSAIL PhD vs. Promising Startup
I am a type of person who loves both academic research and startups. For a long time, it has been my dream to work on deep scientific problems. On the other hand, I am also equally interested in building something tangible for the society. In a perfectly ideal world, I would expect my PhD work to translate into a startup but I know the probability for such a thing is very low. I will probably be 27 ish when I finish my PhD. According to the HN community, what are some of the pros and cons in going to MIT vs. a startup.
7 comments
[ 4.8 ms ] story [ 29.8 ms ] threadPS You'll find a PhD is a great way to network with people as well.
do a year and then take a leave of absence..
Some people go for that Ph.D. to get a good-paying job in a big institution, typically bumping along a professor's pet project for a few years before they publish a lengthy, painstaking, and never-read-again dissertation. You don't have to go at it that way.
Consider doing both at the same time. A tiny minority of Ph.D. students will drive at something that is both their passion and capable of supporting a great business model. If you have a decent professor (the kind that wants to change the world as opposed to the one that wants slaves) it is possible to go that way.
Alternatively, you could do both at the same time and leave with a Master's or no degree once your startup requires more of your time. I believe the founders of Google followed this approach.
My first startup I did in parallel with graduate school. The two subject matters had zero overlap, and that had its benefits too.
YMMV.
Also, vonsydov had a good idea. I know a lot of MIT programs let you take a 1 year deferment. Maybe you can take a cut at the startup, and if you go belly up, go to school. If you end up a billionaire, buy vonsydov a beer.