Do find it out that a small country like UK can force a world wide requirements, though. I think they should only consider their own market and not force the Ubisoft
Never heard of a non-local company unable to close their branch, this does not make any sense at all, it looks more fishy than anything else, more marketing to me to make people talk about them, since we all know they would have managed, UK agreement or not. Maybe UK is building "a case" to be able to fine msft/activision, since they are not part of EU anymore, they have to do that by themselves now. And I am on UK side (I quite dislike msft and activision), but anti-trust (mass default install), obvious planned obsolescence are plenty to fine them all the time at their scale, namely gigantic. That should be "fixed" by the US administration, but they have no clue how to do that, actually who has?
11 comments
[ 5.0 ms ] story [ 34.4 ms ] threadBoth Microsoft and Activision have customers in the UK. The merger will affect these customers, so the UK regulator needs to approve the merger.
This is inconsistent, at best seriously weird.
As strange at is might look like, US companies have to obey the law of countries they operate on.
Which seems to be quite strange apparently, as I have to educate some of them on how German work law works.