Ask HN: Work for mgr who's never heard of Joel Spolsky?
Scenario: technical interview, question arises something regarding Unicode text in memory.
Interviewee: "hmmm, wish I could ask Joel Spolsky or at least remember his Unicode essay..." Interviewer (potential future manager): "Joe LaSpoli? Who?" Interviewee: "Joel Spolsky. You know, Joel on Software, co-founded Stack Overflow?" Interviewer: "Hmmm, cool, I'll have to check him out."
If interviewee is ultimately offered a job, is this a red flag or no big deal?
23 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 61.4 ms ] threadPerhaps your interviewer is better at resisting procrastination than me? (I should be polishing off a grant proposal now as I write this, but here I am commenting on HN instead..)
Some positions may require an extensive knowledge of who's who and what the trends are in the industry, but I would guess a technical position is not one of them.
Not a red flag, in my opinion.
Not a flag, red, green or otherwise.
I'm not accusing you of doing this, but some people that are well versed in the cultural hacker scene constantly play out an obnoxious variation of this in the form of:
"You've never heard of X? Really? C'mon, X, the inventor of Y?"
It does not endear them to their colleagues.
I'm happy to talk about figures in computing with anyone else who shares a similar interest, but I make zero correlation of their competencies whether they know of a certain figure or not.
Saves them a lot of pain in the ass.
That's how red flags work.
Anyway some red flags say "uneven pavement."
Some say "bridge out."
How you treat each of them depends on what you are driving, where you are going, and why you are going there.
Good luck.
What if the job offers better work life balance?
How about if their current job sucks?
Did “cool I’ll check it out” feel sincere?
Is not knowing about Joel signify a serious cultural misfit or not?
How does the op operate socially?
The meaning of the event in the context of reality is always going to be “it depends” because reality is complex and complicated and messy.
https://www.theregister.com/2013/10/04/verity_stob_unicode/
Does the interviewee know about Verity Stop?
I think that is just as much of a red flag as not knowing about Joel Spolskly (pretty much none)
On the other hand, if you don't know about Donald Knuth (at least heard the name) I would be concerned.
You contrast Spolsky against Knuth, that's the subtlety part. There has to be someone prominent enough, that if a software engineer said they'd never heard of that person, you'd scratch your head and wonder what's up. Is Knuth sufficiently prominent? Dennis Ritchie? Sergey Brin? Linus Torvalds? Bill Gates?
Same with Brin and google.
There is no "nuance" in your question. Your question was pretty black and white; in your own words, the question is whether "they []ever heard of Joel at all, as in, never heard the name and never came across any of his writing."
As I mentioned, if the interviewer never heard of Linus Torvalds or Bill Gates, would you really say "it doesn't matter?" If yes, then I kind of wonder about your judgment a little bit. If no, then the question could be re-worded as, "Is Joel Spolsky sufficiently famous or influential among professional software engineers that you'd hesitate before working for someone who had never heard of him," which is a more nuanced question, as it asks the respondent to place him along some spectrum and to determine where the cutoff point is.