Reddit admin caused some drama in r/combatfootage when they came down on them for having Hamas pov videos. It's a very muddled stance. Ukrainian and Russian pov: a-okay. Israeli settlers in the west Bank shooting unarmed palistinians: also a-okay. Hamas: no-bueno. Somebody make it make sense. I'd ask there but of course the thread was already locked.
Another of those four examples is internationally designated as a violation of the 4th Geneva Convention under UNSC Resolution 2334. I don't think one can say that international condemnation is particularly unique to any of them.
If I remember right, Reddit hired somebody who was formerly at NSA or Pentagon. Posting anything anti-Ukranian or pro-Russian gets heavily censored. Not surprised that it happens with Hamas too, as the US provoked a civil war between Fatah and Hamas by openly and publicly favouring Fatah. They hate Hamas.
The article says the opposite sides use the app, not just one side pushing their propaganda (naturally, that along is enough to blame for "misinformation"). Great app.
That would be a cool feature - they take feature requests at https://bugs.telegram.org/ - I'm not aware of any competing apps that have it so it's possible noone has requested this before. Seems novel.
You can certainly block "annoying" users from chatting with you directly. You can leave channels that you don't like. The only thing I can think of which you can't do is block users in groups you aren't the admin of.
25 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 72.6 ms ] threadThey also got all of USSR's debts.
What are you talking about? I can't find any video you're describing
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/search?q=palestinians
1. Can't block annoying posters
2. No functional website
For these reasons I avoid it if possible.
You surely don't mean web.telegram.com isn't functional?
web.telegram.com redirects to www.usatoday.com
You probably meant web.telegram.org which is well hidden and nowhere to be found on their web site so I didn't know about it.
Thanks for that.
The point on blocking still remains. You wouldn't have solution for that as well? :)
... why?
> The point on blocking still remains
That would be a cool feature - they take feature requests at https://bugs.telegram.org/ - I'm not aware of any competing apps that have it so it's possible noone has requested this before. Seems novel.
Discord has that, though I wouldn't call it Telegram's competitor
twitter?
Telegram.com belongs to Telegram & Gazette, a newspaper owned by Gannett. Gannett also owns USA Today.
The Telegram app has always used Telegram.org.
It's not hidden, it's right there in the list of apps along with everything else: https://telegram.org/apps
> The point on blocking still remains. You wouldn't have solution for that as well? :)
Some custom clients allow you to block users in group chats (and also can filter out spam in channels). Depends on your platform though.
I guess I didn't think I need to search for the web site in the Apps.
I'm confused. In what context?
You can certainly block "annoying" users from chatting with you directly. You can leave channels that you don't like. The only thing I can think of which you can't do is block users in groups you aren't the admin of.