I am interested in reading the classics on my own instead of attending a school. But do you think this is can be done without any instructors for the diacletic
History topics are among the most complicated for studying without teacher because no statement can be tested like in Programming.
BTW Liberal Arts are not reading the classics. It is: Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric plus Algebra, Geometry, Music and Astronomy. None of that requires reading the classics.
> The term "liberal arts" for an educational curriculum dates back to classical antiquity in the West, but has changed its meaning considerably, mostly expanding it. The seven subjects in the ancient and medieval meaning came to be divided into the trivium of rhetoric, grammar, and logic, and the quadrivium of astronomy, arithmetic, geometry, and music. The modern sense of the term usually covers all the natural sciences, formal sciences, social sciences, arts, and humanities.
Yes, those are what were classically considered the "liberal arts" (that is, the arts that were appropriate for free people, rather than slaves, who learned skills appropriate to the trades, if they learned anything at all).
But no, when we currently talk about "liberal arts" (especially in a university setting), we no longer are talking about just those things. The term has changed meaning over the last 2000 years. When someone makes a post today, should assume their use of the term is today's use, not the use from the Greek and Roman era.
This is one of the claims of the Harvard classics collection, which includes more than just philosophy and social studies. If you want to dig deep, you could go through it.
You can absolutely just sit down, read the classics, and then read discussions of them. You can gather ideas, and it's not impossible that you could get your own thoughts published.
However, you'll miss a lot of the point. The classics aren't a set of facts you can memorize and apply, the way you can with programming or the hard sciences. They're a set of world-views, different from your own and from other people. Even when you bring your own world view to it, even by reading what other people have thought of it, you'll still miss that dialectic. You'll miss the skill of listening and challenging your own ideas.
It would be a bit like trying to learn to dance from reading books. You can, but you really can't. You need the eye of somebody experienced to tell you what you can't see or feel for yourself because you have only your own perspective.
You can easily find yourself a book group or other discussion forum. Ideally, it would be more than just casual readers, but people who were dedicated to the domain you're studying. That might be bulletin boards or listservs or other places where scholars gather. If you're not challenging yourself against the specialists, you're going to miss out on a lot of the real insights.
Ultimately, there's no real substitute for the liberal arts education process, where you work with other students, guided by an instructor. Personally, I like the idea of Signum University, which is working on taking that idea as seriously as a brick-and-mortar college but entirely online. It's much, much cheaper, and presents the opportunity to do real scholarship.
7 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 37.3 ms ] threadBut no, when we currently talk about "liberal arts" (especially in a university setting), we no longer are talking about just those things. The term has changed meaning over the last 2000 years. When someone makes a post today, should assume their use of the term is today's use, not the use from the Greek and Roman era.
You can absolutely just sit down, read the classics, and then read discussions of them. You can gather ideas, and it's not impossible that you could get your own thoughts published.
However, you'll miss a lot of the point. The classics aren't a set of facts you can memorize and apply, the way you can with programming or the hard sciences. They're a set of world-views, different from your own and from other people. Even when you bring your own world view to it, even by reading what other people have thought of it, you'll still miss that dialectic. You'll miss the skill of listening and challenging your own ideas.
It would be a bit like trying to learn to dance from reading books. You can, but you really can't. You need the eye of somebody experienced to tell you what you can't see or feel for yourself because you have only your own perspective.
You can easily find yourself a book group or other discussion forum. Ideally, it would be more than just casual readers, but people who were dedicated to the domain you're studying. That might be bulletin boards or listservs or other places where scholars gather. If you're not challenging yourself against the specialists, you're going to miss out on a lot of the real insights.
Ultimately, there's no real substitute for the liberal arts education process, where you work with other students, guided by an instructor. Personally, I like the idea of Signum University, which is working on taking that idea as seriously as a brick-and-mortar college but entirely online. It's much, much cheaper, and presents the opportunity to do real scholarship.