20 years ago picture-in-picture was a common feature on TVs. Even the most expensive TVs now don't support PIP. Why isn't it easy to show all of my HDMI inputs on the screen at once?
it complicated the display UI, when the trend was toward fewer and more virtualized controls. It wasn't really easy to use.
You just want the hard inputs? what about the built in tuner? where and how does the sound mix? Output ch2 sound to a different external speaker and use the internal for ch1? etc.
Nobody really wanted it to the point of figuring out how to use it, or coming up with a control convention that spread to other users. For so many uses where "PIP" is useful, a 2nd display is much more useful, easier to set up and use, and more likely to be replaceable.
Next question is "What about 3D TV?" ... Many mature industries go through these cycles of marketing bullshit.
IIRC it was mostly useful for letting you channel surf during commercial breaks and using the PIP to know when to flip back, or making sure your VCR was chugging along making your Sopranos bootlegs.
Really? On Costco, Target, Best Buy, etc., the overwhelming majority I can see (or filter by) are 4k. The 1080s are actually much rarer than I expected.
(edit: or maybe you meant that most people bought their TVs a while ago and never upgraded?)
Those tuners cost money, due to unnecessary licencing for codecs, and with the cable boxes locked down there isn't an easy way to watch two stations anymore beyond having multiple TV's going or using a HTPC. It was mostly useful for sports and a related issue with Sunday evening broadcast TV occasionally getting delayed due to NFL bumping the schedule later. The only other use was neurotic channel surfing during commercial breaks, again obsolete with streaming and DVRs.
My new LG TV can split in two much like "Back to the Future 2". I also use Firefox's PIP like video pop-out. So I'd say it evolved, yet remains as much a niche as the original feature always was.
If they are unimportant why bother with any of them in the first place? And if we decided to watch one, why bother trying to be up to speed with the other?
But I'm a weirdo and I don't even have the TV set so that's that ;-)
The only times I clicked on the picture in picture button in the browser is when I mistook it for the full screen button. I have no idea what I might want to use it for.
Most people now use their TVs to watch on-demand, streamed content. But even for the people who watches broadcasting stuff, their phones now fill the need to watch something else during commercials.
This isn't PIP on TV but I use the PIP feature on MacOS ALL THE TIME! It's so handy with Youtube videos. Just open in Safari, two-finger click and then two-finger click again to open the OS menu and go into PIP.
For one thing (on Windows), the PiP window floats above all other windows, so you can always view it. Of course you can do this with a new browser window but not natively without some workarounds (perhaps on other OS's).
It's better because you can keep that video floating on top of your other apps. It'll follow you as you switch between windows and you can even hide it to the side if it's blocking something.
24 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 55.4 ms ] threadYou just want the hard inputs? what about the built in tuner? where and how does the sound mix? Output ch2 sound to a different external speaker and use the internal for ch1? etc.
Nobody really wanted it to the point of figuring out how to use it, or coming up with a control convention that spread to other users. For so many uses where "PIP" is useful, a 2nd display is much more useful, easier to set up and use, and more likely to be replaceable.
Next question is "What about 3D TV?" ... Many mature industries go through these cycles of marketing bullshit.
(edit: or maybe you meant that most people bought their TVs a while ago and never upgraded?)
But I'm a weirdo and I don't even have the TV set so that's that ;-)
Hope this helps someone!