I won't comment on the "better people" aspect, that seems kind of loaded, but I know that my cycling/running trips around the neighbourhood are much better at helping me feel a part of and knowledgeable about the area than when I get in the car.
I concur. Getting an e-scooter makes me see my city in a new way. I chalk it up to ease of transition. If I want to stop and look at something, I can do so in seconds. I can just walk my scooter on the sidewalk and sightsee to my heart's content. I'm less likely to notice something interesting in my car as I'm focused on not killing people. I can't just stop suddenly. I have to find parking. I worry about what's going to happen to my car. Sure, if I want to leave my scooter behind I have to find even more sparse bike racks or risk it getting stolen. Then again, the total loss might be less than the heartache of dealing with insurance and the police.
I've driven a golf cart around on a residential street and rode in an old model T. Both have an immediacy with your surroundings that you simply do not get in a car.
Digress, immediacy is why convertibles were popular. Immediacy is fun. Where driving most cars is like playing a sucky video game. Yes lets play EA's Commute to Work for an hour in the morning and an hour after work.
Makes me think about a different world with scooters, bicycles, and low speed vehicles dealing with transits last 3 mile problem instead of using cars cars and more cars.
My observation is that perfectly nice people turn into sociopaths when driving large vehicles. They instantly become resentful of all other road users, especially pedestrians or cyclists who might slow them down. You can watch the transformation in real time.
My observation is that perfectly nice people turn into sociopaths when biking on public roads. They instantly become resentful of all other road users, especially pedestrians or drivers who they slow down. You can watch the transformation in real
time.
Are we actually going to compare the momentum of a bike in a vacuum? I will give you 20kg for a bike even, because the weight of the bike is so negligible.
100kg * 24km/h = 2400 kgkm/h
vs a car
If we cross-reference this with a list of pedestrian fatalities based on speed [1] Assuming a standard car size of 1000kg.
1000kg * 25kph = 25000 kgkm/h == 10% Risk of severe Injury
1000kg * 37kph = 37000 kgkm/h == 10% Fatality
1000kg * 51kph = 52000 kgkm/h == 25% Fatality
1000kg * 67kph = 67000 kgkm/h == 50% Fatality
1000kg * 80kph = 80000 kgkm/h == 75% Fatality
1000kg * 93kph = 93000 kgkm/h == 90% Fatality
I'm not saying this doesn't happen, but you're looking at momentums that are an order of magnitude smaller than momentums where people are at severe risk of injury with a car. I will choose to get hit by the bicycle every day of the week.
Upfront: I live in Amsterdam (NL) and haven't owned a car in at least a decade: in fact, I'm slightly opposed to private car ownership, since that just causes a lot of metal junk taking up otherwise usable space. I walk and/or cycle everywhere where possible, am an avid public transport customer, and use public (shared) and/or privately rented EVs for any other trips.
However, the idea that cyclists are in any way "better" than automotive drivers is entirely ridiculous. Sure, they pollute less, but that's not what we're talking about here.
Once a certain class of drivers gets the upper hand in everyday traffic, bad things happen. So, if you're a cyclist in, say, San Francisco (US), you will frequently get threatened by automotive traffic. This is bad.
But, if you're a pedestrian (or even a not-so-experienced automotive driver) in Amsterdam (NL), you'll frequently get intimidated by over-entitled cyclists. This is bad as well.
Change is needed, but that mostly comes in the form of "sharing is good", not "this class is better than the other"...
I think you missed the point of the article - cyclist are described as "better" because they are more aware of their surroundings and more involved in their local community.
Btw on your point, I visited Amsterdam for the first time this March and I didn't feel threatened by over entitled cyclist at all, but the fact that I live in Berlin might give me a different perspective.
I'm sure you're right, but motorists turn right without looking and occasionally kill someone. Antisocial behaviour without the fatalities is an improvement.
15 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 47.2 ms ] threadDigress, immediacy is why convertibles were popular. Immediacy is fun. Where driving most cars is like playing a sucky video game. Yes lets play EA's Commute to Work for an hour in the morning and an hour after work.
Makes me think about a different world with scooters, bicycles, and low speed vehicles dealing with transits last 3 mile problem instead of using cars cars and more cars.
2) A fair bit when you include the 80kg rider going at 24kph into an unaware pedestrian.
100kg * 24km/h = 2400 kgkm/h
vs a car
If we cross-reference this with a list of pedestrian fatalities based on speed [1] Assuming a standard car size of 1000kg.
1000kg * 25kph = 25000 kgkm/h == 10% Risk of severe Injury
1000kg * 37kph = 37000 kgkm/h == 10% Fatality
1000kg * 51kph = 52000 kgkm/h == 25% Fatality
1000kg * 67kph = 67000 kgkm/h == 50% Fatality
1000kg * 80kph = 80000 kgkm/h == 75% Fatality
1000kg * 93kph = 93000 kgkm/h == 90% Fatality
I'm not saying this doesn't happen, but you're looking at momentums that are an order of magnitude smaller than momentums where people are at severe risk of injury with a car. I will choose to get hit by the bicycle every day of the week.
[1] https://aaafoundation.org/impact-speed-pedestrians-risk-seve....
2016-2020 Data: https://www.moneygeek.com/insurance/auto/analysis/pedestrian...
This feels like a very driver's view of cyclists, and not a cyclists view.
But ultimately, I think cyclists are just people.
However, the idea that cyclists are in any way "better" than automotive drivers is entirely ridiculous. Sure, they pollute less, but that's not what we're talking about here.
Once a certain class of drivers gets the upper hand in everyday traffic, bad things happen. So, if you're a cyclist in, say, San Francisco (US), you will frequently get threatened by automotive traffic. This is bad.
But, if you're a pedestrian (or even a not-so-experienced automotive driver) in Amsterdam (NL), you'll frequently get intimidated by over-entitled cyclists. This is bad as well.
Change is needed, but that mostly comes in the form of "sharing is good", not "this class is better than the other"...
Btw on your point, I visited Amsterdam for the first time this March and I didn't feel threatened by over entitled cyclist at all, but the fact that I live in Berlin might give me a different perspective.
If that's indeed the point of the article (which seems to be your conclusion, not mine...), it's plain misguided.
Cyclists, once they're the majority of traffic, are just as singularly and a-socially focused on getting from A to B as anyone.
The only way to break through that kind of behavior is to emphasis sharing.