Useless summary of what is clearly another source, without an obvious link to that actual source, no photos of the experiment and a bunch of secondhand discussion. Just repost garbage, likely to drive ad views (not that I'm willing to turn off ad blocking to find out).
> Using the Solidigm P5336, however, StorageReview was able to “obliterate'' current storage limitations and open up a world of possibilities for users.
Click the link that's embedded in "Solidigm P5336"
8 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 30.7 ms ] threadThe actual source article (https://www.storagereview.com/review/solving-steam-deck-shad...) is sort of pointless too, but in a more fun experimentation way. The "is this possible even though you wouldn't want to do it" way.
Its as if an LLM wrote it, even though I know its probably human.
Want to boost the capacity of your $500 toy? Add $1650 in storage!
I also don't see that in the original article at all.
> Using the Solidigm P5336, however, StorageReview was able to “obliterate'' current storage limitations and open up a world of possibilities for users.
Click the link that's embedded in "Solidigm P5336"
Which takes you to:
https://www.techradar.com/pro/worlds-highest-capacity-pcie-s...
Which contains:
> (As of August 2nd, multiple vendors have started to list the 15.36TB and 30.72TB model for about $55 per TB)
Which actually highlights that I misread/misquoted. It's $55 per TB, not 15-30. I will update my post.