Is there a problem with this article? I often see news shared here from a variety of sources founu or funded by questionable characters such as a the Daily Mail. I saw no issues with the content of the article before sharing.
You can read about it also in the San Diego Union Tribune (the case is going through San Diego courts) here:
I didn't notice the site itself, but it does have some very odd and poor writing in this article.
Like this wordy sentence:
>The U.S. Department of Justice has now reportedly contacted Kristy Althaus, who recently filed a lawsuit against Aylo for apparently being the victim of a rape during the shooting of a GirlsDoPorn video
Also it quite confusingly alternates between "PornHub," "MindGeek," and "Aylo" and it's not clear which company specifically is getting acted upon
Did the other links a shared in the comment above preform better? Seems kinda funny that the whole conversation is focused on sentence structure with no mention of the content of the article. It really doesn't seem that bad to me.
7 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 26.6 ms ] threadYou can read about it also in the San Diego Union Tribune (the case is going through San Diego courts) here:
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/courts/story/2023-...
Or on Yahoo!'s Complex:
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/pornhub-parent-company-r...
If either of these articles are not acceptable I can post the news again.
Like this wordy sentence:
>The U.S. Department of Justice has now reportedly contacted Kristy Althaus, who recently filed a lawsuit against Aylo for apparently being the victim of a rape during the shooting of a GirlsDoPorn video
Also it quite confusingly alternates between "PornHub," "MindGeek," and "Aylo" and it's not clear which company specifically is getting acted upon
If you take a look the writing, quotes used and phrasing is nearly the exact same. They just reworded things.