> “Although the defendants accept they caused the damage, they deny that their actions amount to criminal conduct. Simply put, the damage was caused during a protest and the defendants say that they were lawfully justified in doing what they did."
This is sheer insanity. I hope HSBC has an avenue for further litigation.
It is insanity. They were filmed causing actual damage. The case is as straightforward as can be.
There is absolutely no "lawful justification" for what they did. Well if there is I am sure they wouldn't mind if someone did that to their house, would they?
2 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 17.4 ms ] threadThis is sheer insanity. I hope HSBC has an avenue for further litigation.
There is absolutely no "lawful justification" for what they did. Well if there is I am sure they wouldn't mind if someone did that to their house, would they?