4 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 21.8 ms ] thread
The author thinks that SELinux is a distribution - it's not, it's a technology that can be enabled by any distribution. That pretty much blows the credibility of the whole thing as far as I'm concerned.
The end of the article does mention this:

> SELinux is not its own distribution. It is a subsystem of plain-vanilla Linux. SELinux is included in all kinds of Linux distributions, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux, he said.

They apparently didn't fact check or properly research this article because its got some things that are blatantly wrong...

This article is also fairly old, any idea why it was posted?