Ask HN: What do you use to replace incandescent lights?
I'm curious: Do people have good solutions for replacing now-deprecated incandescent bulbs for indoor lighting?
Even when I get an LED lamp with a warmer color temperature, it just doesn't look anything like an old-school light bulb. (I think it's because LED lamps are so much less full spectrum, no matter their frequency.) And I miss the older experience of lighting quite a bit - it just made a house seem like a warmer place.
Sometimes I set up rooms to be lit by only candlelight, which is beautiful, but very dim and obviously very impractical.
Anyone here have solutions for warmer lighting in a post-tungsten-filament world?
86 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 181 ms ] threadJust shop around for better LED lights. There's a lot of variation out there.
https://www.aliexpress.us/w/wholesale-incandescent-e27.html?...
Or Alibaba if you want even cheaper prices at the expense of some research time.
If you want to skip the middle man, order it directly from the manufacturer.
And there are tons of webshops selling a very wide selection of led lights. No need to send people to the big monopolists.
Most of them won't even accept direct orders.
That's why I use CREE. Fantastic bulbs at a reasonable price - a truly good value!
The problem is that the spectrum, which impacts "how other things look to your eyes," can be a wide range of things, ranging from "quite decent" to "a hot, peaky mess." They look the same in terms of how your eyes perceive the bulb, but other things will look very different. If you've ever had a pure RGB LED, and wondered why things look "wrong" when it's set to white, that's the problem - it's three very peaky emissions, and while it looks white, everything else looks wrong in it.
CRI measures this, and as soon as you get the RGB emitters online, the multi-color bulb CRIs tend to head downhill in a hurry.
You can see spectrometer graphs from a Philips bulb I reviewed here: https://www.sevarg.net/2023/03/11/philips-smart-wifi-bulbs/ - it's a good bit better than some of the other bulbs, but it's still easy to get it off the white emitter and into the peaky RGB emitters.
Thanks for this comment, I guess I gotta do some research on this now.
But yes, anything under than will still look "blueish" if it reflects the right tones of blue, or "brownish" if it only reflects the wrong ones. It's just much better than almost every other LED.
Multi element LED banks are good if distant and diffused; but direct lighting from multiple points like that produces fun multiple colored shadows and that is exhausting for close eyeball work, I find. Not good for photography either.
prohibiting incandescent bulbs made less sense than prohibiting alcohol
For regular bulbs I use Energetic Edison style bulb https://www.amazon.com/Equivalent-Filament-Daylight-Non-Dimm...
Strangely the thing that I really noticed when we stopped using incandescent bulbs was that it felt a lot colder during winter nights, as the majority of the energy the old bulbs drew was converted to heat rather than light.
I swap in incandescent builds into a certain cold room in the winter, to deliberately exploit that effect, then I swap them out for LEDs during the summer.
IIRC, it wasn't uncommon to use incandescent builds as cheap heating elements. IIRC, early in the push to ban incandescent bulbs, some German tried to sell them as "heat bulbs," but got squashed by the regulators.
A side effect is really just an effect, and they can be useful. In the race to totally ban things, that often gets lost.
"Radiant heating of humans" is rather substantially more efficient, in terms of "human happiness per watt used," than heating the entire house. I've got some radiant heat panels that get used heavily in the winter, and there's nothing like a good radiant kerosene heater (mine is 10k BTU, about 3kW, almost entirely as heat) on a cold winter night.
i honestly dont understand how people become so fixated on minutæ. my led bulbs look great, and i’ve never thought “wow i really miss inefficient, energy-wasting, hot, single-colour bulbs from 30 years ago”
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Incandescent light isn't single-color, it's all of them. Evidently that matters to some people. Things that don't matter to you might legitimately matter to other people.
> A reference source, such as blackbody radiation, is defined as having a CRI of 100. This is why incandescent lamps have that rating, as they are, in effect, almost blackbody radiators.[24][25] The best possible faithfulness to a reference is specified by CRI = 100, while the very poorest is specified by a CRI below zero.
I believe the best non-incandescent bulb I've seen had a CRI of 92, but (IIRC) most bulbs don't list a number (so can be assumed to be mediocre). I don't know if it's gotten better, because I haven't deep-dived into it for a few years.
You can have a reasonably high CRI for the main 8 elements, and still have very little red, which is something humans are quite sensitive to in terms of perceived light quality. It's not hard to find R9 ratings of >90 in LEDs, but you're into high end LEDs that cost quite a bit more (some of the really high end ones are $30/bulb in small quantities), and the efficiency is somewhat less (lumens per watt), because putting energy into red is less effective than "putting it all in green" with how human eyes work.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Emission-spectra-of-diff...
These are Christmas light specific - but Tru-Tone makes LED bulbs that look like filament bulbs: https://www.tru-tone.com/. I've just ordered some so I'll update this comment once I've had a look.
Except for the bathroom and storage room, all lights in the flat are “smart”.
Paying a few dollars more for the broad-spectrum LED bulbs really does make a difference in light quality.
https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/28/23892761/philips-hue-app-...
Look for high-CRI leds with a colour temperature around 4000K . The 5/6k are quite glaring and cold, the 3k emulate the dingy yellows of low/medium-wattage incandescent.
So glad we’ve “saved” so much electricity.
They're usually not as bright as other bulbs, which isn't suitable for all applications [although desirable in others].
Most modern fixtures are recessed, and the bulbs are "upside down" - so the heat builds up in the base of them, where the power electronics are, and simply fries them. There's a typical, handwaving, "For each 10C above design temperature, the lifetime halves" curve you can apply, and those power electronics are running way above design temperature in "almost all modern uses." So they die quickly.
An enclosed rated bulb is worth trying, if you can find one that does what you want. But good luck. They're cheap consumer devices at this point, built to a price point.
Thermal should be obvious. The components in the bulb's internal power supply can only withstand so much heat.
Interference is harder to track down. Old dimmers designed for incandescent bulbs will destroy LEDs very quickly. Since the problem seems so endemic, I suspect you have a more serious issue with your electrical service. Your AC voltage may be too high or low, or there's some equipment nearby or in your house that's putting a bunch of noise into the AC lines. Likely causes are old, improperly filtered inductive loads. That'd be anything with a big motor in it: washer, dryer, fridge, HVAC, pumps and fans. If you have any old dimmers anywhere in your house, remove them. You can also call your electric utility to see if they can send someone to check it out. They're usually pretty serious about interference like this because it can spread.
If the LEDs have a switching power supply, they should survive basically any high-frequency noise, and any overvoltage that is small enough to pass unnoticed. Leaving only small average voltages to deal with (like from dimmers). Those should be detectable with a multimeter.
But you're making a mistake. You're confusing "should, in a competently designed power supply," with "does, in something trimmed to the absolute lowest cost that will mostly make it through warranty on a product in which nobody keeps the receipts and such around to make the warranty claim."
But iterating on the design is expensive too. And that optimization is well within the region where your suppliers will often cheat(?) and add all that quality back without telling you just because some of their customers demand it and it's cheaper to give you high-quality products than to retool their factories.
Or, in other words, it's quite possible that you have a bulb here or there fail due to those. But you won't get consistent failure with several brands.
LEDs (or actually their power electronics) can't stand nearly the same temperatures that incandescent lights can, so they get cooked. You'll notice brownish stuff coming out of the base when it happens.
My fixture was a series of thick, donut-shaped aluminium rings connected via spacers forming a sphere around the bulb approximately the size of a melon. Three such spheres in total.
The damn thing destroyed two whole sets of lights before I:
-Disassembled one of the fixtures so that only the top is left, exposing the ceramic base.
-Replaced the other two with "efficient mood lighting" 2W 2700K bulbs - those with a transparent head mimicking a glass bulb.
It's not particularly beautiful, but hadn't had any problems since.
And this is not only (cheap) home stuff, you can see this effect walking around in parks or streets, where a lamp is $100..
i have 7-8 long-fluorescent-substitues doing this at home, replaced capacitors in 2 of them, then replaced whole power supplies in 2 others.. then replaced the rest with whole new lamps as the price vs hassle/time-waste did not make sense..
Edit: but as sibling in thread says, if it soo repeatable, something is wrong in your electricity network at home. There is some source of disturbance, maybe even at neighbours. Long ago one bad laptop switching power supply was making an LCD display go crazy 4 rooms away.
I went around the house counting bulbs, found that I had something like 26 incandescent 60 W or 40 W bulbs, and bought enough Walmart bulbs to replace them, plus another dozen to have spares. Since then all my non-smart bulbs other than the small incandescents in some appliances, two incandescents used as heaters in my well shed, and two that are in places I don't go (attic and crawlspace) have been those Great Value bulbs.
I've only had one fail in the 6.5 years since then. That was one in the garage that I dropped onto the concrete floor when screwing it in. They are plastic, not glass, so it didn't shatter like a glass bulb would, but it did not work afterwards.
I gave it to someone at work who was interested in taking it apart to see what broke. If I recall correctly there is an inductor on the PCB is just attached by some thing wire leads and one of those leads broke.
Since you've tried numerous brands, that implies to me (and my tiny sample size) that the problem for you is not the bulb quality, FWIW.
My test was to put the bulbs into a desk lamp that was aimed straight down at the desk. On the desk was a lux meter. The meter was 41 cm away from the bulb. I was in a closed room with blackout curtains on the window and it was night. I'd turn out all other lights before measuring a bulb.
Here are the bulbs I tested and the labels for their columns in the tables below:
The various whites were set using Amazon's Alexa app rather than the Hue app.For each of these bulbs here are the lux readings I got at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 50, 75, and 100%:
Here is the same data except for each bulb it is as a percentage of that bulb's 100% lux:Waveform is a good example of a company that's trying to do it right - you can get photometric reports on their bulbs, with detailed spectrums, the full CRI chart (R1-R15, not just R1-R8, and, yes, their R9 values are quite good), etc.
Nothing beats the warm soothing glow of those things. I use long-life low-watt appliance tungstens in all my lamps, and I will never part with them. The light is superior to that emitted from LEDs, and the appliance bulbs are actually cheaper and more reliable than LEDs, believe it or not. With tungstens, I sleep better, my house is cozier, and I save some money.
LED bulbs are a meme.
I went down a massive rabbit hole last year based on someone's throwaway comment about LEDs and blue, and ended up with my own spectrometer, and quite a few words written on light bulbs, blue light, etc: https://www.sevarg.net/tag/spectrometer/ It includes a lot of spectrums of LEDs vs incandescent, and explains more about the blue spike in all our modern white LEDs (because that's the way that particular bulb type works - a blue emitter with phosphor coatings around it). Unfortunately, incandescents are harder to find these days (stock up on eBay, but buy a few before you bulk - the new "standard bulb" incandescents from a lot of places sing loudly on a dimmer, and are annoyingly audible).
As for candles, skip those and go straight to kerosene lanterns. I've also gone down that rabbit hole: https://www.sevarg.net/tag/kerosene/ My advice is to get a few of the large cold blast style lanterns (the Dietz Blizzard is easily my favorite - it's a good looking lantern, and it puts out a good amount of light, while not being purely massive like the Jupiter I have), and then get some of the low sulfur kerosene substitutes (Klean Heat is one brand, Pure Heat is another, go raid your local tractor supply/farm store sort of place, though Home Depot and Lowes also carry them in my area). These are "no sulfur" fuels compared to the "low sulfur 1K kerosene," and have less of a room note when running. You basically shouldn't smell the lantern except on startup and shutdown if everything is correct, and if you put a particulate meter in the room, it should be far lower than with the candles (especially if you have any airflow at all - candles soot easily, lanterns far less so until it gets really windy).
If you look at the papers that talk about indoor kerosene particulate pollution, you'll find that the high readings come from "bare wick burners" - not a well designed cold blast lantern, which are down at the bottom of the readings, if at all.
Sorry, it's about a year late to be doing this. The new old stock bulbs I really like are no longer floating around eBay, and it's harder to find the older stock stuff anywhere. I just have what should be a lifetime supply of incandescents socked away for the rooms I use in the evenings.
If you are willing to spend more money (from my experience the cost is about double of what you would pay for narrow spectrum LEDs), there are good options available for warm, high CRI lighting.
To give you an example of lights that I recently installed and am quite happy with: https://www.solidapollo.com/Candlelight-Warm-White-ULTRA-Hig...
Consider Spectral Reflectance.
We use only three wavelengths for LED displays that manage to show us millions of colours, HumOns are trichromats right? So the thinking goes - we should also be able to use narrow band light sources to illuminate our physical environment with the same results. But this is just not how illumination works in the physical world.
The difference with displays, is that we are looking directly at the light source, the light source is the image; with lamps, we are looking indirectly at reflections from our physical environment, and physical surfaces reflect different wavelengths with different intensities, i.e they have a spectral reflectance curve (and these can be pretty crazy, not simple smooth curves). The other key detail is that our eyes are not narrow band, they merely quantise broad spectrum into three colours. So just because some surface might reflect brightly at 480nm but not 420nm (humans peak sensitivity), doesn't mean we don't see it, it still looks blue, just less so. The issue is that most standard LED lighting spectral output (phosphors and all) might focus on 420nm so that it looks white, but might have a dip at around 480nm so that reflections on that particular surface appear less blue than they should.
This is the issue people are experiencing when some things look too dark or too grey, surfaces have complex reflectance curves, most cheap LED lights have extremely poor spectral distribution and they can basically miss those surfaces. The more spikey and narrow band a surface's reflectance curve the more likely a narrow band light source is going to miss the reflection wavelengths and do a poor job of illuminating it.
[edit]
To be more fair to LED lighting, the comparison I made above is not entirely fair. Unlike a monitor's output LED lighting actually attempts to get broader spectrum output by adding phosphor layers to convert wavelengths of the LED, it's just that most ordinary price household LED lamps are still very poor in their distribution. It's not impossible to generate a better spectral distribution with LED sources, it's just expensive, and requires more than one LED source wavelength+phosphor combination. The other issue with cheap LEDs you might notice is that the phosphor layers tend to degrade, changing the colour temperature over time, and the inverters commonly break before the filament resulting in a very short and flickery lifetime.
I haven't used these, but this thread instigated a search, seems like there are broad spectrum LED manufacturers like this one [0]. Their target customer makes sense... Some art will undoubtedly look weird in narrow band light.
[0] https://www.savemoneycutcarbon.com/category/soraa-lighting-r...
https://www.omled.com/product-page/omled-one-s5l
They're eye-wateringly expensive and not particularly bright, but the spectrum is reportedly much friendlier than LEDs and they're currently making their way to the automotive world, so prices might decrease over time.
A more realistic proposition might be red phosphorus LEDs:
https://store.yujiintl.com/collections/high-cri-led-technolo...
The key thing is that CRI doesn't tell the whole story about a light's spectrum, as it's an average of 15 test colours and R9 - red - often scores very low, producing a visibly worse image despite high CRI.
Look for lights that advertise high R9.
Aren't there types of candles that are long-lasting and which don't give off the seemingly bad chemicals I tend to hear about?
Get a cold blast kerosene lantern (Dietz Blizzard is my go-to lantern these days), run some kerosene substitute in it, and you'll have a clean burning lamp that doesn't put out nearly the particulates of a candle with any slight air movement.
The advantage of the Jupiter is that the font is gigantic. It holds enough fuel for several days burning - which is the point, it was a "weekend greenhouse heater" lantern, originally.
The Blizzard is a better looking lamp, puts out a bit more light (it drafts a bit better with the taller globe), and is far more at home in a house.
Don't get a Comet for indoor use. They're better than nothing, and after you've burned off the paint, they're... tolerable for casual carry around use, but that's about it. They're just not a great lantern for regular use.