It seems Threads by her or about her are immediately deleted from this platform. She has been vehement in her allegations of sexual abuse by her brother Sam.
FWIW, I agree with those users. HN is supposed to be for intellectual curiosity (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...). This is not a subject that can be discussed in that spirit on a large public forum. It will only turn into a conflict between people with different feelings about such stories in general and/or the $celebrity whose name makes the story significant. Would any of us want our most painful family conflicts argued about like that, by angry strangers who know nothing about it?
You seem to have interpreted this as a judgment, but it's not—it's an empirical observation: this topic is guaranteed not to get an intellectually curious discussion on a large internet forum like HN.
Actually "guaranteed" is too strong - no empirical observation is that certain. But the odds are so close to 100% as to make no difference.
A search "annie altman site:ycombinator.com" gets quite a few pages which are flagged, so flagged by users. Those are then hidden unless you have "showdead" enabled in your settings.
They get flagged (by regular users with the quite low necessary karma to do so) and then aren't visible unless you deliberately looked for them, negative signal in ranking, etc.
For something big enough already at the time, just controversial I think it would (require more flags and) attract mod attention so they'd say open it up but pin a comment telling everyone to chill out.
Basically they're almost certainly just flagged to death before they get any traction, no big conspiracy. It's too personal, nobody knows anything new or unbiased and that isn't hearsay, etc.
7 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 30.1 ms ] threadhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38311509&ref=upstract.c...
The first post is correct…unless she’s unverified.
In truth, dang should step up and clear the confusion.
Much Love, everyone.
FWIW, I agree with those users. HN is supposed to be for intellectual curiosity (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...). This is not a subject that can be discussed in that spirit on a large public forum. It will only turn into a conflict between people with different feelings about such stories in general and/or the $celebrity whose name makes the story significant. Would any of us want our most painful family conflicts argued about like that, by angry strangers who know nothing about it?
I think Annie has been posting about this publicly because she wants it known.
And I don't like seeing her story dismissed as "not a subject that can be discussed" because it's not "intellectually curious" enough for dang.
You seem to have interpreted this as a judgment, but it's not—it's an empirical observation: this topic is guaranteed not to get an intellectually curious discussion on a large internet forum like HN.
Actually "guaranteed" is too strong - no empirical observation is that certain. But the odds are so close to 100% as to make no difference.
For something big enough already at the time, just controversial I think it would (require more flags and) attract mod attention so they'd say open it up but pin a comment telling everyone to chill out.
Basically they're almost certainly just flagged to death before they get any traction, no big conspiracy. It's too personal, nobody knows anything new or unbiased and that isn't hearsay, etc.