Is o_O the best HTML binding library out there? 9 points by weepy 14y ago ↗ HN http://weepy.github.com/o_O
[–] weepy 14y ago ↗ Here's two links to the example pageshttp://weepy.github.com/o_O/examples/guide/index.htmlhttp://weepy.github.com/o_O/examples/todos/index.html
[–] ishi 14y ago ↗ How is it different than knockout? It looks very similar from what I can tell. [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ It certainly shares some features such as data-bind.But it's much smaller and simpler. It's also general purpose rather than the Root style for Knockout.Additionally it uses jQuery to deliver most of the bindings which makes it one less thing to learn. [–] ishi 14y ago ↗ It does look useful, but that's a weird choice for a name... [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ o_O [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ if you don't like the name you can import to another namespace :<script src="../o_O.js?mynamespace"></script> [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ check out how long each of the pages are:http://weepy.github.com/o_O/o_O.jsvshttp://cloud.github.com/downloads/SteveSanderson/knockout/kn...! [–] chc 14y ago ↗ It looks like the primary difference is that Knockout has a no-dependency philosophy while this library is explicitly designed to be used with other libraries. [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ Correct - it's more the toolset philosophy of Backbone rather than Ember or Knockout which are more frameworks.Up to you which philosophy you prefer.
[–] weepy 14y ago ↗ It certainly shares some features such as data-bind.But it's much smaller and simpler. It's also general purpose rather than the Root style for Knockout.Additionally it uses jQuery to deliver most of the bindings which makes it one less thing to learn. [–] ishi 14y ago ↗ It does look useful, but that's a weird choice for a name... [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ o_O [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ if you don't like the name you can import to another namespace :<script src="../o_O.js?mynamespace"></script> [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ check out how long each of the pages are:http://weepy.github.com/o_O/o_O.jsvshttp://cloud.github.com/downloads/SteveSanderson/knockout/kn...!
[–] ishi 14y ago ↗ It does look useful, but that's a weird choice for a name... [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ o_O [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ if you don't like the name you can import to another namespace :<script src="../o_O.js?mynamespace"></script>
[–] weepy 14y ago ↗ if you don't like the name you can import to another namespace :<script src="../o_O.js?mynamespace"></script>
[–] weepy 14y ago ↗ check out how long each of the pages are:http://weepy.github.com/o_O/o_O.jsvshttp://cloud.github.com/downloads/SteveSanderson/knockout/kn...!
[–] chc 14y ago ↗ It looks like the primary difference is that Knockout has a no-dependency philosophy while this library is explicitly designed to be used with other libraries. [–] weepy 14y ago ↗ Correct - it's more the toolset philosophy of Backbone rather than Ember or Knockout which are more frameworks.Up to you which philosophy you prefer.
[–] weepy 14y ago ↗ Correct - it's more the toolset philosophy of Backbone rather than Ember or Knockout which are more frameworks.Up to you which philosophy you prefer.
9 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 32.4 ms ] threadhttp://weepy.github.com/o_O/examples/guide/index.html
http://weepy.github.com/o_O/examples/todos/index.html
But it's much smaller and simpler. It's also general purpose rather than the Root style for Knockout.
Additionally it uses jQuery to deliver most of the bindings which makes it one less thing to learn.
<script src="../o_O.js?mynamespace"></script>
http://weepy.github.com/o_O/o_O.js
vs
http://cloud.github.com/downloads/SteveSanderson/knockout/kn...
!
Up to you which philosophy you prefer.