Ask HN: What is Q* (Q star) at OpenAI and how does it threaten humanity
Reuters broke that the precursor to all the recent drama at open AI started with researchers at open AI writing to the board about a recent breakthrough they made and the threat it poses humanity. (It could be possible that Sam was aware of this and didn’t care but that’s a tangent)
Given where AI stands today what kind of breakthroughs are possible. What are the big gaps to AGI that exist today?
would be great to know of the gaps to follow progress and closeness to achieving AGI
13 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 42.9 ms ] threadQ* might be name derived from Q-learning and A* search algorithm.
In that case it would be informed best best-first search using reinforcement learning.
In Q learning, a learner can take some set of actions to maximize a future reward. In this case, the set of actions at each step is the choice of token and the reward is something like 1 if the user liked the response and 0 if they didn’t. Or since it seems they’re applying this to arithmetic, the goal is some formulation of the solution.
Putting these together, it’s possible that Q* is some better way of decoding. Something built on top of the prior probabilities of GPT.
It’s all out in the open, you can look at the papers coming from the EA community which as Frontier AI Regulation and the freedoms it claims are necessary to strip from society to protect ourselves.
Interesting but not sure who this author is.
Sounds like it might be something notable, perhaps related to Q-learning and A* search as others here have speciulated. How it represents a specific or general existential threat is less clear, to me at least.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/nov/23/openai-was-...
[2] https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-made-an-ai-br...
That's the thing. ChatGPT is interesting, but if it can find more precise associations than "the second best token", that's worrysome for a lot of digital jobs and jobs that can be replaced by robots.