Cementing my opinion that the average telco is a complete clownshow when compared to even the shoddiest-run of national electricity grids. No OOB network? No ability to remotely restart equipment because their own network is down? Critical facilities unstaffed? C'mon. This is basic stuff. You can even do the OOB via satellite these days, you don't have to run separate hardlines.
> compared to even the shoddiest-run of national electricity grids
Who do you think runs connectivity for your average electrical grid outside of the power cables themselves?
There are superposition modems but those assume that the lines themselves aren't damaged so there usually is a whole SCADA system on either a private cellular network or through fiber or copper (depending on age) owned by the telcos.
FWIW during the massive blackout in the early 00's in North America and Canada the telco system held up remarkably well (until the fuel ran out in some places).
> Who do you think runs connectivity for your average electrical grid outside of the power cables themselves?
The grid run their own lines. Underground power cables are always accompanied by a pilot cable, which used to be 2x current loops plus a bunch of twisted pairs, now fiber optic. Underground power cables are almost always run in pairs (pairs of 3 phases) so between every significant substation there's always at least 2 dedicated communication lines.
You have said 'owned by the telcos' and this is very much not my experience. The grid comms network is owned and maintained by the grid.
Interesting! Where I live there are essentially three different providers for long haul SCADA, the railroad infra company, the telcos and the cable companies. And then there are some specialized fiber companies as well. Most power infra that I've seen up close did not include integral communications though I guess it makes sense.
But even the largest grid infra companies here rely on the telcos for their private comms, for instance:
Note the mention of "KPN" for this private mobile network that is nominally owned by the energy company grid operators but in fact is operated by KPN (the largest Dutch Telco) and uses their infra.
It says "Utility Connect wordt ondersteund op het gebied van aanleg en operationeel beheer door Telecom- en ICT dienstverlener KPN" and that's pretty clear to me.
Creation and operational management will be supported by Telco and ICT service provider KPN.
I'd like to point out that the article is referring to a CDMA network used for distribution metering, not the backbone network of site interconnects, which is kinda what we're talking about, given that the subject is the Optus network outage where the outage was of their backbone network.
I's secondarily like to point out that 'supported by' can mean many things, including merely having the telco as a depot for replacement equipment and repair services, etc.
In AU, even for aerial powerlines, we run our own mix of fibre and radio comms between zone subs and stuff like ACR's... in fact I dont think any of the transmission or distribution operators utilise any telco stuff for their control networks
I have seen Lashing fibre to power conductors and it was a bad idea. The conductors sag when heavily loaded on hot days and the lashing digs in to the fibre jacket.
More often than not long-haul fiber within a single metro area is owned by the electrical providers, and the telcos lease strands from them. Telcos will lease fiber from power companies but rarely the other way around.
The intercity stuff often belongs to power companies too, if it's within their service footprint. The Bonneville Power Administration owns most of the long-haul fiber in Washington, Oregon, and western Idaho.
17 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 42.1 ms ] threadWho do you think runs connectivity for your average electrical grid outside of the power cables themselves?
There are superposition modems but those assume that the lines themselves aren't damaged so there usually is a whole SCADA system on either a private cellular network or through fiber or copper (depending on age) owned by the telcos.
FWIW during the massive blackout in the early 00's in North America and Canada the telco system held up remarkably well (until the fuel ran out in some places).
The grid run their own lines. Underground power cables are always accompanied by a pilot cable, which used to be 2x current loops plus a bunch of twisted pairs, now fiber optic. Underground power cables are almost always run in pairs (pairs of 3 phases) so between every significant substation there's always at least 2 dedicated communication lines.
You have said 'owned by the telcos' and this is very much not my experience. The grid comms network is owned and maintained by the grid.
But even the largest grid infra companies here rely on the telcos for their private comms, for instance:
https://nieuws.eneco.nl/stedin-en-liander-bundelen-krachten-...
Note the mention of "KPN" for this private mobile network that is nominally owned by the energy company grid operators but in fact is operated by KPN (the largest Dutch Telco) and uses their infra.
Which country are you in?
You should read that article again. It doesn't say what you've said it says.
Creation and operational management will be supported by Telco and ICT service provider KPN.
I's secondarily like to point out that 'supported by' can mean many things, including merely having the telco as a depot for replacement equipment and repair services, etc.
https://nlnet.nl/foundation/history/
More often than not long-haul fiber within a single metro area is owned by the electrical providers, and the telcos lease strands from them. Telcos will lease fiber from power companies but rarely the other way around.
The intercity stuff often belongs to power companies too, if it's within their service footprint. The Bonneville Power Administration owns most of the long-haul fiber in Washington, Oregon, and western Idaho.