This comment does nothing more than repeat the information provided in the title and in a very verbose style. I don't understand the tendency for GPT generated comments that is lately taking over HN and Twitter threads. They are insipid, add absolutely nothing of value to the discussion, and are generally a waste of time to read.
I'm assuming they're both VC companies in the same portfolio and are cross-marketing. If not, the the descriptions on both sides seem quite excessive indeed...
20 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 66.0 ms ] thread[0] https://www.secondstate.io/articles/convert-pytorch-to-gguf/
Since it's a wasm runtime capable of many things I find bizarre that they now start describing it with a ultra-specific use case
- [1] https://github.com/WasmEdge/WasmEdge
Not sure what the differences are between them.
Are these like AMIs, where you can stuff all kinds of odd shit into them?