Do we need another non-open source available license? (theregister.com) 7 points by alternative_a 2y ago ↗ HN
[–] tazjin 2y ago ↗ > No, but here comes the Functional Source License to further muddy the open-source licensing watersIt's not muddying the open-source licensing waters, because it's not an open-source license.
1 comment
[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 27.1 ms ] threadIt's not muddying the open-source licensing waters, because it's not an open-source license.