Yes, this perfectly maps to what's been released about the board's reasoning and why they wouldn't be able to pinpoint any specific lie. There wasn't one, in that he probably very carefully chooses his language such that he's never caught outright lying. But I wouldn't doubt he's a manipulator.
If Altman was dismissed from YC for similar reasons this would be an excellent time for YC to speak up about it. I understand that for professional courtesy reasons they've been very "smile and say nothing" about Altman's departure but IMO that's increasingly untenable as these stakes go higher.
It doesn't serve PG's interests to say otherwise. Sam Altman is part of the YC brand so his reputation is valuable to YC and to PG's net worth. And he's no longer running YC.
It's unclear to what extent those statements & tweets you read as 'absolutely loving him' really are 'loving him' (as opposed to very British sardonic commentaries & backhanded compliments of the sort that exuberant Yanks routinely misread); see the prior discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38383641
I'm broadly not that supportive of these kind of character assessments or psychological evaluations from afar. They're at best salacious clickbait. I despise Trump and I was even uncomfortable with all the same things around him.
But, I think we might need to start reckoning with the fact that the people who amass a lot of power in our society almost never do it because of their moral fortitude, but rather because they have less than most. If we actually think you should have to be a bona fide good person to be president or run OpenAI, we should probably figure out wtf that means, how we would assess that, and how we'd develop that in potential leaders. Thinkpieces and tweets about it after the fact are frankly pathetic. Maybe come out swinging a little earlier.
One problem there is that if you come out swinging before most people see it too, you will be accused of being jealous, not qualified, etc. And you will be fired instead...
Fair, I mostly mean the media here though. Like we're gonna spend decades lauding Ray Dalio and only when he retires are we suddenly gonna pop the hood and check what's going on in his hedge fund? It's just the meekest clickbait I can imagine and nobody's being the slightest bit bold here.
Still curious how much EA people pulling the strings behind the scenes and jockeying for power played part into the recent drama. Toner and CSET being bankrolled by EA and all.
14 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 49.3 ms ] threadIt doesn't serve PG's interests to say otherwise. Sam Altman is part of the YC brand so his reputation is valuable to YC and to PG's net worth. And he's no longer running YC.
Also discussed in this thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38486394
But, I think we might need to start reckoning with the fact that the people who amass a lot of power in our society almost never do it because of their moral fortitude, but rather because they have less than most. If we actually think you should have to be a bona fide good person to be president or run OpenAI, we should probably figure out wtf that means, how we would assess that, and how we'd develop that in potential leaders. Thinkpieces and tweets about it after the fact are frankly pathetic. Maybe come out swinging a little earlier.