[–] dang 2y ago ↗ Related:Setting up Hetzner ARM instances with and for Objective-S - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35934287 - May 2023 (7 comments)Objective-S: architecture-oriented language based on Smalltalk and Objective-C - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32444300 - Aug 2022 (125 comments)Why are there no return statements in Objective-S? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27231191 - May 2021 (65 comments)Objective-S: architecture-oriented language based on Smalltalk and Objective-C - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27100272 - May 2021 (54 comments)Embedding Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23176942 - May 2020 (7 comments)The Four Stages of Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21791180 - Dec 2019 (2 comments)Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21552264 - Nov 2019 (26 comments)A small (and objective) taste of Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19113476 - Feb 2019 (10 comments)Objective-Smalltalk: now serving its own web site - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18964665 - Jan 2019 (26 comments)Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7161566 - Feb 2014 (67 comments)
[–] SeanLuke 2y ago ↗ > By allowing general architectures, Objective-S is the first general purpose programming language.Well, that's quite a tall claim.
[–] asimpletune 2y ago ↗ Honestly, small talk still seems like it’s from the future compared to the micro services glued together approach that is mainstream of today. [–] frodowtf 2y ago ↗ so why is nobody implementing stuff in smalltalk? [–] janderland 2y ago ↗ This isn’t based on any data, just my intuition…I don’t think humans usually choose the “best” solution. They use solution that are a combination of readily available, easiest to get started with, and popular. [–] asimpletune 2y ago ↗ I think it was a little ahead of its time. [–] igouy 2y ago ↗ People do:https://pharo.org/success/BoeingBoletos.html [–] Kinrany 2y ago ↗ Is there a smalltalk variant that uses a more conventional language and can rely on its package ecosystem?
[–] frodowtf 2y ago ↗ so why is nobody implementing stuff in smalltalk? [–] janderland 2y ago ↗ This isn’t based on any data, just my intuition…I don’t think humans usually choose the “best” solution. They use solution that are a combination of readily available, easiest to get started with, and popular. [–] asimpletune 2y ago ↗ I think it was a little ahead of its time. [–] igouy 2y ago ↗ People do:https://pharo.org/success/BoeingBoletos.html
[–] janderland 2y ago ↗ This isn’t based on any data, just my intuition…I don’t think humans usually choose the “best” solution. They use solution that are a combination of readily available, easiest to get started with, and popular.
[–] Kinrany 2y ago ↗ Is there a smalltalk variant that uses a more conventional language and can rely on its package ecosystem?
8 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 28.8 ms ] threadSetting up Hetzner ARM instances with and for Objective-S - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35934287 - May 2023 (7 comments)
Objective-S: architecture-oriented language based on Smalltalk and Objective-C - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32444300 - Aug 2022 (125 comments)
Why are there no return statements in Objective-S? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27231191 - May 2021 (65 comments)
Objective-S: architecture-oriented language based on Smalltalk and Objective-C - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27100272 - May 2021 (54 comments)
Embedding Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23176942 - May 2020 (7 comments)
The Four Stages of Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21791180 - Dec 2019 (2 comments)
Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21552264 - Nov 2019 (26 comments)
A small (and objective) taste of Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19113476 - Feb 2019 (10 comments)
Objective-Smalltalk: now serving its own web site - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18964665 - Jan 2019 (26 comments)
Objective-Smalltalk - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7161566 - Feb 2014 (67 comments)
Well, that's quite a tall claim.
I don’t think humans usually choose the “best” solution. They use solution that are a combination of readily available, easiest to get started with, and popular.
https://pharo.org/success/BoeingBoletos.html