HN Explorer

4 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 21.8 ms ] thread
shpoonj
Pathetic because: a. the student had a legitimate complaint b. the recipient should have just done it instead of wasting time writing that nonsensical response(seriously, it's not even funny) c. the university seems to find the incompetence of their employees amusing, even 13 years later
acuozzo
> a. the student had a legitimate complaint

So what? Why didn't he walk down to the LCSR and ask politely instead of sending a poorly-written nasty e-mail?

> b. the recipient should have just done it instead of wasting time writing that nonsensical response(seriously, it's not even funny)

I would've loved receiving this reply if I were ``USER NAME''. You don't enjoy absurd humor much, do you?

> c. the university seems to find the incompetence of their employees amusing, even 13 years later

One webpage doesn't speak for a university of >30,000.

shpoonj
a. the response poorly written. the initial message was to the point

b. no

c. yes it does

acuozzo
> a. the response poorly written. the initial message was to the point

In what way(s) was the response poorly written?

> b. no

That's unfortunate.

> c. yes it does

``You cannot reach that conclusion from the evidence given'' --shpoonj