I thought that at first but the comments don't really have that AI stink to it or the 3rd world scammer reply chain aka (person 1: does anyone know anyone who can help with. my crypto purchase? person 2: hello sir, mrs heather, i have purchased her services on whatsapp and i could not be happier. i made my money back and then some).
Maybe the people replying are quote unquote normies? aka not the younger generation or terminally online twitter users?
edit: i noticed alot of the usernames have 4 numbers at the end. could be bots. or is this just how youtube recommends usernames to people now?
Can you give examples instead of such insinuations. I see nothing wrong with comments there, or maybe the spam got removed since? On the other hand, here...
Claiming that the small amount of $ handed out to people during the pandemic in the US (less than $2000?) enabled millions of people to retire is obviously silly. Which shows that the talking head is ideology driven (anti-government intervention) and not facts driven. Which makes the interview a waste of time. However the comments are spot on and worth a read.
10 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 34.3 ms ] threadShorter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDokADZfvwc
60 min: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brw-jN9b-Sg
Maybe the people replying are quote unquote normies? aka not the younger generation or terminally online twitter users?
edit: i noticed alot of the usernames have 4 numbers at the end. could be bots. or is this just how youtube recommends usernames to people now?
> Racing0461