And you're probably better off without reading a lot of this stuff.
Advertising can easily be a source of income without privacy invasion. Those who don't figure this out may be in for a rocky road ahead.
Google is wisely positioning itself for this new reality but it won't give up blatant privacy invasion until absolutely forced to do so.
To me, the only interesting aspect of Google's new "Topics" proposal is the ability to disable it and whether doing so will actually stop the privacy invasion madness. History suggests they will blow right through this in the same way they did "Do Not Track".
5 comments
[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 20.9 ms ] threadAdvertising can easily be a source of income without privacy invasion. Those who don't figure this out may be in for a rocky road ahead.
Google is wisely positioning itself for this new reality but it won't give up blatant privacy invasion until absolutely forced to do so.
To me, the only interesting aspect of Google's new "Topics" proposal is the ability to disable it and whether doing so will actually stop the privacy invasion madness. History suggests they will blow right through this in the same way they did "Do Not Track".
The fastest way to convince me *not* to use a product is to associate one of these names with it. And this extends beyond just social media.
I use /eOS/ on my phone and Brave as my browser only after I became satisfied that these are reasonably stripped of privacy invasion.