[–] eps 2y ago ↗ It would've helped greatly if the post bothered to mention the language. [–] jasonjmcghee 2y ago ↗ It's Rust [–] ramon156 2y ago ↗ When primeagen is mentioned, you can assume it's Rust (; [–] innocenat 2y ago ↗ Agree. I recognized the Rust language when I saw the actual code but would be nice to know just from the title. [–] scotty79 2y ago ↗ Arc<str> looks Rusty
[–] innocenat 2y ago ↗ Agree. I recognized the Rust language when I saw the actual code but would be nice to know just from the title.
[–] Philpax 2y ago ↗ That's interesting. I wonder how `Rc<str>` would fare - it should be able to avoid the locking. (Of course, you lose the ability to send it across threads... but that might not matter) [–] saghm 2y ago ↗ Not sure if they added this since you posted this comment, but at the bottom they mention the following under "Notes":> Someone asked why I’m not including Rc<str> in this comparison, the reason is single-threaded Arc<str> has a pretty similar performance profile.
[–] saghm 2y ago ↗ Not sure if they added this since you posted this comment, but at the bottom they mention the following under "Notes":> Someone asked why I’m not including Rc<str> in this comparison, the reason is single-threaded Arc<str> has a pretty similar performance profile.
[–] cmiller1 2y ago ↗ I don't mean to pick nits but this post could really use some proofreading. "You might be wandering" "Terminlogy" [–] [deleted] 2y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
10 comments
[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 38.2 ms ] thread> Someone asked why I’m not including Rc<str> in this comparison, the reason is single-threaded Arc<str> has a pretty similar performance profile.