Is this a refutiation of Betteridge Law of Headlines?
Sounds like it might be, OTOH, the most important factor here is probably the user/prompter of the AI.
From the conclusion:
We observed that participants who had access to the AI assistant were more likely to introduce security vulnerabilities for the majority of programming tasks, yet were also more likely to rate their insecure answers as secure compared to those in our control group. Additionally, we found that participants who invested more in the creation of their queries to the AI assistant, such as providing helper functions or adjusting the parameters, were more likely to eventually provide secure solutions
Edit: corrected "Pepperidge" to "Betteridge". God, things like this make me question if I am an intelligent being myself
4 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 18.7 ms ] threadSounds like it might be, OTOH, the most important factor here is probably the user/prompter of the AI.
From the conclusion:
Edit: corrected "Pepperidge" to "Betteridge". God, things like this make me question if I am an intelligent being myself