25 comments

[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 60.7 ms ] thread
Well written, interesting article overall, but saying "Reveals True Origins" isn't the best way to communicate scientific research (too strong)
That is really an absurd headline considering the content of the article. Defining who you are has very little to nothing to do with were some of your ancestors may have come from 5000 years ago.
If you found this interesting and want to dive deeper, I recommend 'The Horse the Wheel and Language' by David Anthony. The book is an intellectual tour de force, yet easily approachable. Integrating linguistics, genetics, archaeology and vigorous academic debate within and across the disciplines, startling conclusions emerge from seemingly intractable starting positions and thin, unreliable evidence.
Great book but slightly outdated as it doesn't incorporate the results of the Southern Arc paper etc.
[flagged]
Why do you say that, for those not familiar with it?

EDIT: And the article seems unaccesible to me right now.

There is a huge propaganda push to equate Israelis with 'Europeans' and 'Americans' to help justify the US and EU looking away from the atrocities being committed in Gaza.
Such push only exists in your head..
Maybe so, but probably not from Haaretz, which seems to be the foremost Israeli outlet to criticize the government for the atrocities right now.
Even if that were true (I have personally not seen any sign of it, Israeli pro-war propaganda is much more direct), this article has nothing whatsoever of the kind. They do not show nor talk about any kind of commonality between the people living in Israel and those in other parts of Europe.
(comment deleted)
They are quite directly reporting on a research paper published in Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06865-0

This seems like either a misguided pro-Palestinian jab at an Israeli paper (I for one very much support Palestine, but that has nothing to do with this article) or even simple antisemitism of the "great replacement" white nationalism variety. I hope I am mistaken.

Haaretz is Israel's most internationally respected Israeli paper. It's generally liberal and sympathetic to Palestinians, so the warning could also be a anti-Palestinian jab at a left-leaning news source.
Oh, right, I forgot about that possibility...
While that may be true of many Haaretz articles, at least in this case this article does not appear to contain anything else but a good enough summary of the two open-access research papers published in Nature, which are linked in the article.

Moreover, the conclusions of the 2 articles about the 3 main migrations that have affected most of the Europe are not controversial or completely new, they just bring more precision and additional details to what was already known.

(comment deleted)
Sounds like a pop-sci summary of complex issues.

Throws things around like 'no living descendants' of Neanderthals, except for half of us that still have their genes? What else does it take, to be a descendant?

And 'left the caves' which is a folk story. We have evidence of really ancient peoples in caves, and evidence of more modern ones everywhere. Why? Because 'they left the caves'?

No, because older evidence outside caves degraded because, well, they weren't in caves which are stable cold-rooms for preserving whatever is in there. Include perhaps some exceptional individuals who chose to go there (and die there). No reason to believe there was any special cave-preference at any time in history.

Anyway, I quit reading there.