9 comments

[ 9.3 ms ] story [ 158 ms ] thread
What’s the point of this article? It cites a paper from 2007 and references another paper from 2010. It’s an interesting factoid, but very dated information and the article adds nothing by way of journalism.
Perhaps it's a filler article picked from a pile: either a pile of prewritten articles or a pile or preselected topics.
I'd be super interested to hear your list of organisms discovered since 2007 that can survive extended exposure to low Earth orbit conditions.

I was kinda hoping tardigrades would be involved but lichen would have been my second guess.

it's already known tardigrades can survive on the surface of space ships, but with an important caveat: they need to already be in the "tun" state, which is a dessicated husk that is metabolically inactive. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Ex... although I guess the lichen results predate the tardigrade results.
The point of the article?

Most likely to attract advertising dollars and pad the income of the guardian with interesting information

Once we have established with high confidence that other planets don’t have native life, We can start looking for life forms which can survive natural environment. Imagine we seed Venus with life. ;)
(comment deleted)