[–] bnrdr 2y ago ↗ “If your article can be summarised as ‘No.’ don’t write it.”https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2010-11-26 [–] didntcheck 2y ago ↗ AKA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline..."Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word 'no'"However I don't think it really applies to this article. It may be considered a weak article, but it's not a "no" article (which would be stronger anyway)
[–] didntcheck 2y ago ↗ AKA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline..."Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word 'no'"However I don't think it really applies to this article. It may be considered a weak article, but it's not a "no" article (which would be stronger anyway)
[–] mouzogu 2y ago ↗ this was interesting. to me at least.a paper is in peer-review about possible bio-signatures detected.
4 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 28.9 ms ] threadhttps://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2010-11-26
"Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word 'no'"
However I don't think it really applies to this article. It may be considered a weak article, but it's not a "no" article (which would be stronger anyway)
a paper is in peer-review about possible bio-signatures detected.