Ask HN: What's your philosophy?

50 points by jmtame ↗ HN
Just curious, what drives you? Why exist?

136 comments

[ 61.0 ms ] story [ 641 ms ] thread
To experience the beauty of existence.
Working to make self-actualization more likely for myself and others.
Determinism.
<flips coin>

I flipped a coin to decide whether I should up mod or down mod this. Was the coin flip pre-determined by my previous actions? Did I actually up mod or down mod this? :)

By reading it, you caused it to collapse into a modded state. :)
I gave up on determinism when I learned quantum physics.
There is nothing random in QM, only in it's interpretation. But interpretations are meaningless as there is no way to differentiate them via experiment.
I never said there was anything random. Only non-deterministic. Of course, we are arguing philosophy, so experiments are useless.
People have, throughout the ages, attributed to randomness (or now non-determinism) things they couldn't understand.
Or they attributed it to a higher power (fatalism/determinism).

Pick your poison.

(comment deleted)
I'd like to hold the opposite view: There is randomness but the world is still deterministic. Just imagine there was a big one-time table of random numbers generated with the world. Whenever a random bit is needed, it's gets taken from the table.
I am into negative philosophies, it often is a lot easier to say certain important ideas are false than to establish an overarching truth. One negative philosophy is that determinism is incoherent as a philosophy, since philosophy implies choice. While simple sounding, that idea is actually very, very deep and cuts through every discipline I know of. It forms the basis for my views on capitalism, technology, metaphysics, etc.
How does philosophy imply choice?
If it isn't a choice, then there's not much point talking about it, is there?

Another example is Rand's argument that there is absolute truth: saying there is no absolute truth is a self contradiction, so it is an untenable position. That avoids the whole problem of trying to point out a specific absolute truth, while still showing its the better position.

My Son. (and his soon to be bother/sister)

Sounds hokey, and it's a relatively new feeling for me, but everything I do these days is all about enabling him.

his soon to be bother/sister,

Ah. To be a bother; the sacred duty of little sisters everywhere...

lol... good catch. Perhaps that's my own personal foreshadowing!
beautiful sentiment, but don't make him the center of your universe, because YOU should be the rightful, temporary center of his universe and not the other way around.

Remember that the end goal of your being his father is for him to become his own man; if your identity is solely 'his father' you will have nowhere to stand when he is no longer first and foremost 'your son'. A man with an identity crisis does not a mature man's father make. For his sake, devote your life to something honourable and deserving of your attention; he will see your example, and model after you, directing his energy upwards and outwards, instead of inwards and downwards like you are doing.

You may not believe me, but that's exactly what happened to the Chinese (my) people, so, be careful.

Oh, most certainly!

I'm concerned with doing two things really:

1. Making sure he has the opportunity to become exactly whom he wants to be, regardless of what that is.

2. Through example and instruction, ensure that he's capable enough to properly value and evaluate his different options, and mature enough to work hard enough to achieve them.

While ultimately, everything I do is tempered by what I think would be the best for him, I do live my own life and have my own goals. For example, I've always wanted to be a pilot, and in due time I hope to achieve that goal. I'd love for him to share in that accomplishment, but I certainly have no expectations of him to become a pilot himself, and if he's not that big on flying, it certainly won't stop me.

Your advice is sound though. From my outside observations (I live in Vancouver so I get a good chance to observe) of asian families in general, I think there are many that should be heeding your words. I'd just as soon say though that many North American raised people - regardless of culture - could use some more devotion to something other than themselves though!

(comment deleted)
I'll die anyway so why not make the most of the time I got?
Not knowing everything. I don't know exactly what drives me, but i have an enormous need to find out. The same with all sorts of other questions, if most people were me, and asked themselves the same stuff as i do, and got similar answers, they would be either mad, or really weird, I've managed to stay slightly mad and moderately weird, but i don't know for how long, and I'm eager to find out.
Well, it's hard to tell from just a few lines, but I would guess that your are an INTP personality.
The quest for happiness
you have nine holes. if you can control what goes into them, and what goes out of them, you will be fine
(comment deleted)
do unto others then run like hell
i ain't got nothin' better to do
Always taking the fork in the road that'll result in the best story.
(comment deleted)
Don't experience life through the filter of a philosophy.
Isn't that a philosophy?
I think you both just disappeared in a poof of logic...
(comment deleted)
I want to live my life, not just exist within it.
well trying to prevent a midlife crisis. By the time I hit mid to late 30s I want to be spending a lot more time on things that I am passionate about - my family, kids (hopefully when I have them), my violin and entrepreneurship, and lot less at a job that sucks out my life!
I exist to misbehave, it's fun.
Curiosity, and for the pure enjoyment of it.
The only metaphysical purpose of a human being is to survive.

The only moral purpose of a human being is to pursue happiness.

"The only metaphysical purpose of sarah connor is to survive.

The only moral purpose of sarah connor is to pursue happiness."

-- T-800

But, as the Dalai Lama said, it's easy to confuse happiness with pleasure, and it's not always easy to understand the difference.
To make something from nothing that has an impact, hopefully for the better, in how people live.

Hitting payroll, though, in the more short term. :)

I would like to think that java programmers adhere to objectivism thus I must be into functionalism which I feel is an analog to utility? Making proceduralism futility?