Ask HN: How do you get important news faster? Do you care about it?
How do you get news in the first place?
Do you filter a lot and only read small amount?
Do you care at all to get news asap or do you feel like if something is important to you then you’ll hear about it later anyway?
18 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 50.5 ms ] threadIt's only when I'm about to get on a plane that I need to double-check that I'm not flying somewhere suddenly volatile.
Well, now I can think of some: weather and traffic reports.
Some smaller agencies use Twitter, though, unfortunatley.
Basically, all I care about is trafic conditions, extreme weather warnings (rare around here), the date of the next bulky trash collection, and information related to my trade.
How has it been? Both good and bad. I do like having a physical paper put in the mailbox, as it's fun to look forward to a "delivery" every day that is more real than just looking at my phone.
On the other hand, I find the FT to be worth reading only about every other issue, largely because there simply isn't enough news to report in 24 hours. The opinion and editorial sections make up a decent portion of the paper and largely aren't worth reading. But, every other issue or so, there are a few excellent articles absolutely worth the price of admission. And even then, the quality of the "boring" articles is leaps and bounds above what I used to read in the NYT or the Guardian.
I'm not sure if I'll be renewing it later this year, as it does feel like I'm wasting a lot of paper – but only on the days when I don't enjoy the articles. I wish they had a twice weekly edition, which would be the perfect interval IMO.
Yep, the country's going to shit still, the Middle East is at war, the world's burning up, schoolkids are getting murdered, etc. Same ol', same ol'. Nothing I can do about any of it anyway, so what's the point of stressing over it?
I don't even remember any major events after Covid, and my life seems no better or worse off for it. I also deleted all my social media a few years ago, and that was definitely a HUGE net positive.
I don't think people in general -- as a barely evolved ape -- really have the mental and emotional capacities to consume ceaseless global catastrophes in real-time. It just seems like a surefire recipe for anxiety and depression. The "media-pharmaceutical complex", maybe?
There is absolutely something you can do about it. Vote. And that doesn't take 24/7 monitoring of news, it just takes a few minutes every year or two.
- All-in podcast when I feel like being entertained
99% of news is generally irrelevant to daily life, maybe once a month something catches my eye and I feel like being more informed about the topic
https://sumi.news/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events
Just for a quick sweep.
Then I open Twitter/X and browse to my local news site.
This takes at most 5 minutes to skim world (and local) events and catch up.
Otherwise I used to check the news mostly for the dopamine hit or out of boredom but rarely benefit from that. I still do, but I limit it much more and have to say, less is better. I don't believe I've missed out on any news that would have made my life better and if it's ever something really really important, someone will probably tell me anyway
HN is quite fast too, almost too fast. It'll probably be off the front page by the time I'm awake. But not for political news.