This technology has the potential to do so much good. I feel like we should be getting updates from the Company itself and not the Billionaire owner on his social media site.
Put a chip in both a mouse and a human, and who'll be able to say whether the human is the one controlling the mouse? Kidding. The mouse's chip would have a different interface.
If brain chip tech keeps improving, what would be the better (for any earnest definition of better) option between interfacing directly with the computer vs. interfacing with a computer mouse and a keyboard connected to the computer?
I truly feel like this technology could do so much good. It could even out the playing field of intelligence and distribute it equally amongst everybody. Think of integrated LLMs on neurallink, sounds interesting but also a bit frightening
5 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 13.9 ms ] threadSometimes, the good isn't worth the bad.
If brain chip tech keeps improving, what would be the better (for any earnest definition of better) option between interfacing directly with the computer vs. interfacing with a computer mouse and a keyboard connected to the computer?