> Dr Barack and his colleagues collected data from 457 adults who completed an online foraging game where they had to collect as many berries as possible within eight minutes.
> Participants who scored higher on the ADHD scale spent shorter periods of time in each patch of bushes and were thus more likely to gain more points in the game than participants with lower scores on the ADHD scale.
So as I understand it, ADHD in that setup basically introduces chaos / randomness to avoid falling into local optima.
It immediately follows that having ADHD may be a major disadvantage in environments where there is only one global optimum (for example, a highly regulated and deterministic academic environment like school or undergraduate studies, or an established corporate environment).
What I’m curious about is how this relates to other findings that ADHD individuals tend to be better in crises than non ADHD. That is a scenario where honing in and focusing on doing the necessary thing is paramount, and where many just flounder and do nothing.
> ADHD individuals tend to be better in crises than non ADHD
Two potential factors come to mind. Firstly, those with ADHD are always having to think on their feet and drag their attention back to the issue at hand so when there is a highly distracting and distressing situation it is merely an issue of degree for them. Secondly, another symptom of ADHD is hyper-focus which may help in certain crises.
If that's right, then it follows that giving medication to suppress it is a bad idea for humanity as a whole. Although it may help an individual cope better with a local situation, it would be better to have more situations in which an individual with ADHD can thrive.
You can choose when to take meds and when not to. I was actively encouraged by my doctor to be selective and I have a prescription for both the timed release and the normal forms.
I am fully capable of recognising situations where the meds help and where they hinder.
I am fully capable of recognising situations
where the meds help and where they hinder.
How does this work for you in practice?
I take mine selectively as well, to an extent. But in practice I am limited by the fact that there's a certain physical dependency - if I'm accustomed to N mg daily, I can't take less than about 50% of that dose without feeling some withdrawal symptoms such as brainfog and physical lethargy.
(For whatever it's worth: I don't have much trouble cycling off completely. I can go from 100% to 0% in a few days if I taper the dosage.)
Based on anecdotal experience I kind of want to say mild withdrawal is the norm but that might well be selection bias at work: people are more likely to talk about withdrawal than they are to talk about the lack of withdrawal.
In my personal experience, just to put things in perspective: I would describe my adderall withdrawal as approximately half as bad as caffeine withdrawal. I don't have any other forms of withdrawal with which to compare it.
I don't take Adderall. I'm in the UK and I think it's fairly uncommon here. The first choice meds on the NHS is usually methylphenidate. I also briefly tried lisdexamfetamine but it didn't suit me as well.
Yes. They all have possible withdrawal symptoms. I'm glad you don't experience them! However, I think we can all agree that it's beneficial if everybody knows they exist.
Oh, I certainly wasn't intending to give the impression I doubted that they did. (But I also wouldn't want people to have exaggerated fears about withdrawal - it's hard to know which is more need of correction)
From my own experience and that of many peers I've talked to it really seems to benefit DJing as a skill. It's an activity where you get to be hyperfocused and freely associating/improvising at the same time. Not really a career-path I'd recommend to anyone though.
That experiment is slightly funny because there's a popular Hololive streamer who's famous for 1. being ADHD and 2. collecting lots of berries in Minecraft.
I think it would make sense to study advantages of ADHD in the modern world as well. Personally I think the "default" in our society where you're required to focus for 8h a day on things you aren't constantly enthusiastic about puts individuals with ADHD at a disatvantage, to the point where we can either try to bridge the gap with medication, or find non-9to5 jobs that we are better suited for.
But while I have a strong suspicion that ADHD is an advantage in some jobs, I think it should be studied more thoroughly.
I have often considered my experiences with depression in a similar context. Depression drives me to optimise for satisfaction rather than joy, which makes me into an occasional workaholic where I will obsess over goals, ignoring all other interactions. Could be advantageous in climates where preparation for winter was critical for survival?
I think that's true. Perfectionism / always seeing flaws everywhere and always expecting the worst would have been a major evolutionary advantage in areas where not being prepared for winter essentially meant death for you and all your loved ones.
500 years ago, my ancestors lived in high-alpine settlements. 200 years later, they successfully lived through the 30 years war in an area where 70% of the population starved or was slaughtered to pieces. I always wondered how the traits selected by these events / environments might still affect me hundreds of years later.
Depression is optimal for rumination/pondering. It signals that you and your current environment do not match the ideas you have about what you and your environment should be like.
Either change the environment or change yourself or change your ideal image of yourself or the environment.
Your body doesn't exist for the sole purpose of self harm. It exists to keep you alive and have offspring.
You could think of depression as a dynamically added constraint in a linear programming problem. When you add the constraints, the current solution becomes infeasible, indicating that you can't stay where you are, you must search for the new optimum.
Using medication or telling people to stop being depressed is counterproductive, since it interrupts the process that the depression is supposed to kickstart.
Questions for those who have ADHD: is it possible to have ADHD and not be able to focus on certain things (important conversations, studying, planning) while also being able to really focus on other specific things like programming?
Yes, of course. If something is really interesting to the ADHDer, he or she can completely forget every thing else and enter in hyperfocus mode [1].
When one is diagnosed, and aware of this hyperfocus thing, one can use it very efficiently. I, for one, use it to work, with the help of an app called Focus@will, where I can set a timer, and play very loud music, so my brain is focused on the task at hand.
> When one is diagnosed, and aware of this hyperfocus thing, one can use it very efficiently.
Some can. Others end up in jail [0], or dead [1]. I wouldn't want anyone to assume that if they have ADHD, they automatically have access to some sort of super power - it doesn't always work out like that.
Like you though, I do try to harness this as best as possible for work. Music works quite well as an aid for me too.
Yes, 100%. It's not just "possible"... you're describing exactly what ADHD is like for me. This is one reason why I didn't seek an ADHD diagnosis until later on in life. I didn't understand that it was possible to have ADHD and also be able to "hyperfocus" on certain things.
It's also why I think ADHD is such a badly named condition. You don't have an attention deficit you have an attention regulation deficit - which means sometimes you can have a surplus of attention which you (often) cannot control.
Yes that is basically ADHD summed up (from my experience, I can't speak for others).
Without medication I can only focus on things that I really like or am interested in. On some days there are other topics that interest me more than programming, so it isn't that I continuously can focus on programming, but far more easy and often than concentrating on things that don't give me immediate joy.
So in general I can focus less on studying, planning, important conversations, but this is not the case when I for example study programming related things (I'll easily fall in a rabbit hole), or if the planning is about an interesting topic.
Yup, if your brain gets caught in a feedback loop of "this makes me happy" and "being happy stimulated means we can continue doing this" you can do the fun stuff for hours without a break and disregarding anything that happens around.
Boring (in a non-judgemental sense - plain) tasks very rarely trigger it. You can kinda cheat though by adopting a new exciting system for doing X to achieve X. (You'll likely abandon the system shortly after...)
This research is pretty dubious given they didn't do thorough ADHD diagnosis on the subjects, only a 6 question self-report test. Then they used some kinda ML hokum to supposedly strengthen their confidence in the results of those 6 questions. Seems pretty sloppy to me.
> Helps to own your own business or at least work remotely.
I wonder how many ADHDers learnt this during COVID. It may have been the first opportunity for some to experience this and perhaps realise that they can work more effectively in a different environment (which they have more control over).
That's what you'd think when you hear people talk about hyperfocus. But trust me, you don't want to have ADHD. You only want to have the good sides of it.
Yeah but that's the point. The spectrum is way too broad. For some people that's their daily life.
For me it's either I get paralyzed and depressed for a week or two and basically can't get anything done. Or I kinda work "normal" (maybe just being a lot faster than neurotypical people, but certainly not longer). 18 hour hyperfocus sessions only occour every few months for me.
* ADHD doesn't mean you can hop from X to Y to Z superfast/efficiently while remembering anything meaningful.
* Hyperfocus isn't a spell you can cast at whatever task at hand. It happens only when you're really into a given topic... And ADHD tends to push you to procrastinate on things you like a lot: you end-up in hyper-procrastination mode.
Above points can be used to your advantage with great benefit, but it's not automatic. Some people with ADHD compensate intuitively and do impressive stuff, others need medication just to get out of bed. Both of these extremes can be the same person at different times.
You can learn how to hack your stubborn brain and take advantage of the waves of motivation.
Stimulates are a instant gratification solution, but man take those all the time and you will be pretty damn irritable and mentally tired after awhile.
It's natural for "ADHD" people to work in waves. Long sprints and rest in between. I know it's popular to advocate drugging yourself, but people reach for that too quickly.
>It's natural for "ADHD" people to work in waves. Long sprints and rest in between. I know it's popular to advocate drugging yourself, but people reach for that too quickly.
>Society is the problem, not them.
I wish it was that easy. It's not. ADHD is an extremely broad spectrum. There are some habits which CAN bring me into hyperfocus, but they don't work all the time.
What do you mean by people reach to fast for stimulants? Coffee and energy drinks basically have the same effect as methylphenidate on me, they just don't last as long.
Before my diagnosis I was always flabbergasted that people were so astonished as I told them that coffee and energy drinks bring me down. Now I know the reason why. But in the end reducing my coffee and energy consumption, but taking meds in a controled way works a lot better for me. But I also know people where meds don't work at all (in a beneficial way). There is really no way to sum up "ADHD people". It's just way to nuanced.
Edit: I am literally sitting in the office right now, hyperfocusing on the weird typing frequency of my neighbour and just can't put on my headphones and start coding. I would even try to hear that with my noise cancelling headphones on. Gotta get up now, take a short walk and hopefully when i come back i can start.
Nope, you can't with ADHD. My interest will be there on random subject, not the one I would select.
And stimulant kind of help. They're not magic... you have to use therapy, exercise, meditation, organisation to cope. Fun. That's maybe why people can be irritable under medication (and which kind... people react differently to very similar molecules so...)
but man take those all the time and you will be pretty
damn irritable and mentally tired after awhile.
No argument there.
It's natural for "ADHD" people to work in waves. Long
sprints and rest in between. I know it's popular to
advocate drugging yourself, but people reach for that too quickly.
This is easy to say, but there are a variety of reasons why not everybody (and in fact, most people) can't precisely tailor their lives to meet the whims of the ADHD brain. Even entrepreneurship has lots of "boring" stuff that you have to simply plow through to get to the interesting stuff.
I did not intent to advocate for any solution (drug-based of otherwise), just tried to say that ADHD covers a wide spectrum of situations.
Some won't be able to "hack" their brain for motivation (which, btw, comes from doing something in the first place), some will. Some will react well do medication (compounds, amounts…), some others won't. There is also CBT.
It's not that simple. I mostly got rid of my ADD and haven't noticed any disadvantages beyond learned behaviours that are not productive anymore. You definitely don't need ADHD to keep up with information - for me it's easier without. I can jump between topics, but can also choose not to - that was not an option before.
The occasional hyperfocus is not necessarily helpful either - hours of sleep sacrificed to continue doing something fun are not a great outcome.
It would be interesting to hear more feedback about it from people who experienced both sides. Hopefully there's going to be many more over time. I'm becoming a bit sceptical regarding the advantages, but there's a lot of confounding variables there.
Email me and I’d be happy to try and help you more than this. Mine is definitely almost gone though. Conclusion is that multiple foods I am sensitive to and cause some sort of immune response/ inflammation.
Although a simple suggestion would be to search for ADHD elimination diet.
Basically I cut out everything but apples pears rice potatoes carrots fish meat olive oil salt pepper broccoli and cauliflower.
"You Mean I'm Not Lazy, Stupid or Crazy?!" is one of, if not the, most popular ones. Saw a lot of myself in there.
What are the things "most people" agree ADHD "is"?
Above all else, it's an executive functioning disorder. Not entirely dissimilar from OCD in some ways.
You find yourself unable to focus on what you know needs to be done, quite possibly because you're unable to tear your focus away from something else.
Inattention, impulsivity, hyperfocus, hyperactivity. Adult ADHD does not often involve physical hyperactivity.
Hyperfocus can be an incredible boon if you happen to be hyperfocused on something useful. But the catch is that it's not a switch you can flip at all and you can't necessarily choose what you're focused on.
There are different subtypes such as "primarily inattentive" etc.
A lot of people don't believe in ADHD or think it's a "lack of discipline" etc.
Like many disorders, symptoms of ADHD are things everybody experiences to an extent and it becomes a "disorder" when it starts to impact one's functioning. In much the way that everybody is sad sometimes but when it becomes pervasive we call it a disorder called "depression."
I think what I've said above is all mostly universally agreed upon.
Actually hyperactivity is very common in adult ADHD, it just manifests differently. It tends to take the form of repetitive movements like shaking a foot, rocking a leg, fidgeting with your hands, etc. It's sort of a naturally developed coping mechanism.
People with adult hyperactive/impulsive or combined type ADHD often don't think of this as hyperactivity, partly because they're so used to it they're barely aware of it, or the fact that it's not normal.
I dislike theories like this; how ADHD, and depression could be mechanisms that evolved because of some evolutionary advantage they give us. I am not denying that could be the case, but living in a world full of stimulation everywhere is vastly different from living in a hunter-gatherer commune. ADHD could just be a neurological defect that never manifested itself in a quiet communal lifestyle, and become pronounced with modern technology.
I don't think there's much point in theorizing how it could've offered an evolutionary advantage, because even if ADHD existed at that time, it would be very, very different from what it is today.
In fairness that's not really how evolution works. If a person reproduces, their traits are not eliminated. Evolution doesn't optimise for advantages, it eradicates disadvantages that preclude reproduction
> ADHD could just be a neurological defect that never manifested itself in a quiet communal lifestyle, and become pronounced with modern technology.
I agree on this - My personal theory is that ADHD is basically just a lower level of background dopamine (expanded thoughts here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39453578) in the same way some people have trouble producing insulin - in the age of basic survival it's probably not that much of a hindrance, there's a constant supply of dopamine spikes. Surviving, being an integral and useful part of the tribe, getting bored of the current berry bushes and moving on to finding the next while the normal people finish harvesting this lot, chasing down wild animals while not being eaten, getting major props for inventing a better pointy stick to hunt with, that sort of thing.
Modern day doesn't really have as much of that - the high enough to matter dopamine spikes are at least much less frequent (compounding that over many years leading to depression and lack of motivation etc)
Did I understand correctly that the study was done with people that displayed ADHD-like behavior, but were not actually diagnosed with ADHD, and then made presumptions about the advantages of ADHD?
77 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 151 ms ] thread> Participants who scored higher on the ADHD scale spent shorter periods of time in each patch of bushes and were thus more likely to gain more points in the game than participants with lower scores on the ADHD scale.
So as I understand it, ADHD in that setup basically introduces chaos / randomness to avoid falling into local optima.
It immediately follows that having ADHD may be a major disadvantage in environments where there is only one global optimum (for example, a highly regulated and deterministic academic environment like school or undergraduate studies, or an established corporate environment).
Well said. In other words, the ADHD “agent” mostly chooses the exploration strategy in the Exploration vs. Exploitation dilemma.
Two potential factors come to mind. Firstly, those with ADHD are always having to think on their feet and drag their attention back to the issue at hand so when there is a highly distracting and distressing situation it is merely an issue of degree for them. Secondly, another symptom of ADHD is hyper-focus which may help in certain crises.
I am fully capable of recognising situations where the meds help and where they hinder.
I take mine selectively as well, to an extent. But in practice I am limited by the fact that there's a certain physical dependency - if I'm accustomed to N mg daily, I can't take less than about 50% of that dose without feeling some withdrawal symptoms such as brainfog and physical lethargy.
(For whatever it's worth: I don't have much trouble cycling off completely. I can go from 100% to 0% in a few days if I taper the dosage.)
Withdrawal is certainly not unheard-of. https://www.webmd.com/add-adhd/adderall-withdrawal
Based on anecdotal experience I kind of want to say mild withdrawal is the norm but that might well be selection bias at work: people are more likely to talk about withdrawal than they are to talk about the lack of withdrawal.
In my personal experience, just to put things in perspective: I would describe my adderall withdrawal as approximately half as bad as caffeine withdrawal. I don't have any other forms of withdrawal with which to compare it.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/methylphenidate...
Oh, I certainly wasn't intending to give the impression I doubted that they did. (But I also wouldn't want people to have exaggerated fears about withdrawal - it's hard to know which is more need of correction)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39503740
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39502145
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39482292
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39464367
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39454924
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39452680
But while I have a strong suspicion that ADHD is an advantage in some jobs, I think it should be studied more thoroughly.
500 years ago, my ancestors lived in high-alpine settlements. 200 years later, they successfully lived through the 30 years war in an area where 70% of the population starved or was slaughtered to pieces. I always wondered how the traits selected by these events / environments might still affect me hundreds of years later.
Either change the environment or change yourself or change your ideal image of yourself or the environment.
Your body doesn't exist for the sole purpose of self harm. It exists to keep you alive and have offspring.
You could think of depression as a dynamically added constraint in a linear programming problem. When you add the constraints, the current solution becomes infeasible, indicating that you can't stay where you are, you must search for the new optimum.
Using medication or telling people to stop being depressed is counterproductive, since it interrupts the process that the depression is supposed to kickstart.
Inattention in ADHD isn't really the inability to focus, it's the inability to direct focus.
When one is diagnosed, and aware of this hyperfocus thing, one can use it very efficiently. I, for one, use it to work, with the help of an app called Focus@will, where I can set a timer, and play very loud music, so my brain is focused on the task at hand.
[1]: https://add.org/adhd-hyperfocus/
Some can. Others end up in jail [0], or dead [1]. I wouldn't want anyone to assume that if they have ADHD, they automatically have access to some sort of super power - it doesn't always work out like that.
Like you though, I do try to harness this as best as possible for work. Music works quite well as an aid for me too.
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/jun/18/uk-prisoners...
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371172/
A term to look into: "hyperfocus"
ADHD is sometimes talked about as being misnamed, and as more of an interest/prioritisation disorder than "attention" deficit. [1]
Urgency and other factors can help put things back at the top of the pile (which can of course bring with it all sorts of poor habits to navigate) [2]
EDIT: looks like a bunch of us all posted the same thing in tandem, I'll update this to add some refs so it's not pure duplication
[1]: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-need-to-rename...
[2]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851038/
It's also why I think ADHD is such a badly named condition. You don't have an attention deficit you have an attention regulation deficit - which means sometimes you can have a surplus of attention which you (often) cannot control.
Without medication I can only focus on things that I really like or am interested in. On some days there are other topics that interest me more than programming, so it isn't that I continuously can focus on programming, but far more easy and often than concentrating on things that don't give me immediate joy.
So in general I can focus less on studying, planning, important conversations, but this is not the case when I for example study programming related things (I'll easily fall in a rabbit hole), or if the planning is about an interesting topic.
Boring (in a non-judgemental sense - plain) tasks very rarely trigger it. You can kinda cheat though by adopting a new exciting system for doing X to achieve X. (You'll likely abandon the system shortly after...)
There's a reason ADHD articles are shared profusely here.
Information moves faster these days, you need ADHD to process it efficiently and hyper-focus on long tasks.
Those who can do that naturally become developers.
You just have to workaround social norms like work schedules.
Helps to own your own business or at least work remotely.
I wonder how many ADHDers learnt this during COVID. It may have been the first opportunity for some to experience this and perhaps realise that they can work more effectively in a different environment (which they have more control over).
But you're right that most of the disadvantages stem from other people, and aren't inherent. It's more than a bit annoying.
(trying to stay focused on a long task or figure something out quickly skimming through things)
Bad side is I get a pizza and bed day.
Good side is I have fun coding for 18 hours and get a week of work done.
For me it's either I get paralyzed and depressed for a week or two and basically can't get anything done. Or I kinda work "normal" (maybe just being a lot faster than neurotypical people, but certainly not longer). 18 hour hyperfocus sessions only occour every few months for me.
I realize others have a differing degrees and handling of it.
Thus you can't say whether one individual "wants" it or not.
* Hyperfocus isn't a spell you can cast at whatever task at hand. It happens only when you're really into a given topic... And ADHD tends to push you to procrastinate on things you like a lot: you end-up in hyper-procrastination mode.
Above points can be used to your advantage with great benefit, but it's not automatic. Some people with ADHD compensate intuitively and do impressive stuff, others need medication just to get out of bed. Both of these extremes can be the same person at different times.
Stimulates are a instant gratification solution, but man take those all the time and you will be pretty damn irritable and mentally tired after awhile.
It's natural for "ADHD" people to work in waves. Long sprints and rest in between. I know it's popular to advocate drugging yourself, but people reach for that too quickly.
Society is the problem, not them.
>Society is the problem, not them.
I wish it was that easy. It's not. ADHD is an extremely broad spectrum. There are some habits which CAN bring me into hyperfocus, but they don't work all the time.
What do you mean by people reach to fast for stimulants? Coffee and energy drinks basically have the same effect as methylphenidate on me, they just don't last as long.
Before my diagnosis I was always flabbergasted that people were so astonished as I told them that coffee and energy drinks bring me down. Now I know the reason why. But in the end reducing my coffee and energy consumption, but taking meds in a controled way works a lot better for me. But I also know people where meds don't work at all (in a beneficial way). There is really no way to sum up "ADHD people". It's just way to nuanced.
Edit: I am literally sitting in the office right now, hyperfocusing on the weird typing frequency of my neighbour and just can't put on my headphones and start coding. I would even try to hear that with my noise cancelling headphones on. Gotta get up now, take a short walk and hopefully when i come back i can start.
It can be beneficial. Depends on how you handle your brain.
And yes I was mainly talking about harder stimulants, they do have side effects, like irritability.
And stimulant kind of help. They're not magic... you have to use therapy, exercise, meditation, organisation to cope. Fun. That's maybe why people can be irritable under medication (and which kind... people react differently to very similar molecules so...)
You may be able to. This is not universally true.
It's something you can learn how to do, but just like many things you can learn, not everyone will.
Some won't be able to "hack" their brain for motivation (which, btw, comes from doing something in the first place), some will. Some will react well do medication (compounds, amounts…), some others won't. There is also CBT.
No. Those who can do that become multi millionaires/billionaires. Developers get stuck on the local minima of programming.
The occasional hyperfocus is not necessarily helpful either - hours of sleep sacrificed to continue doing something fun are not a great outcome.
Anecdotal of course, as is yours. But everyone handles their brain differently.
If not, take the stimulants and see if that lasts long-term.
No need to assume either way for anyone.
This has caused me to doubt the belief that all modern mental disorders had an “evolutionary advantage” or that we should assume so.
Although a simple suggestion would be to search for ADHD elimination diet.
Basically I cut out everything but apples pears rice potatoes carrots fish meat olive oil salt pepper broccoli and cauliflower.
You find yourself unable to focus on what you know needs to be done, quite possibly because you're unable to tear your focus away from something else.
Inattention, impulsivity, hyperfocus, hyperactivity. Adult ADHD does not often involve physical hyperactivity.
Hyperfocus can be an incredible boon if you happen to be hyperfocused on something useful. But the catch is that it's not a switch you can flip at all and you can't necessarily choose what you're focused on.
There are different subtypes such as "primarily inattentive" etc.
A lot of people don't believe in ADHD or think it's a "lack of discipline" etc.
Like many disorders, symptoms of ADHD are things everybody experiences to an extent and it becomes a "disorder" when it starts to impact one's functioning. In much the way that everybody is sad sometimes but when it becomes pervasive we call it a disorder called "depression."
I think what I've said above is all mostly universally agreed upon.
People with adult hyperactive/impulsive or combined type ADHD often don't think of this as hyperactivity, partly because they're so used to it they're barely aware of it, or the fact that it's not normal.
I don't think there's much point in theorizing how it could've offered an evolutionary advantage, because even if ADHD existed at that time, it would be very, very different from what it is today.
In fairness that's not really how evolution works. If a person reproduces, their traits are not eliminated. Evolution doesn't optimise for advantages, it eradicates disadvantages that preclude reproduction
> ADHD could just be a neurological defect that never manifested itself in a quiet communal lifestyle, and become pronounced with modern technology.
I agree on this - My personal theory is that ADHD is basically just a lower level of background dopamine (expanded thoughts here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39453578) in the same way some people have trouble producing insulin - in the age of basic survival it's probably not that much of a hindrance, there's a constant supply of dopamine spikes. Surviving, being an integral and useful part of the tribe, getting bored of the current berry bushes and moving on to finding the next while the normal people finish harvesting this lot, chasing down wild animals while not being eaten, getting major props for inventing a better pointy stick to hunt with, that sort of thing.
Modern day doesn't really have as much of that - the high enough to matter dopamine spikes are at least much less frequent (compounding that over many years leading to depression and lack of motivation etc)