So we're just posting foxnews links now like they're legitimate articles?

The article could have at least explored the contrapositive: what about books that praise Big Tech's political positions? Mentioning hallucinated reviews in a vacuum doesn't "expose" anything unusual here.

I'm not sure if I understand this article. Is the claim that Gemini was used to post fake reviews for a book (such as on Amazon), or did someone ask Gemini for a review in which it then gave hallucinated facts?