15 comments

[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 49.5 ms ] thread
Considering how SF manages other stuff, where is the optimism coming from that they will manage this well? Genuine question.
Seems like the first prima facie good idea in a while, I'm wondering how they will screw it up.
(comment deleted)
SF is probably the second worst managed organization I interact with on a daily basis.

PGE is the worst.

I'll take any opportunity to rant positively about how great living in Chattanooga, Tennessee is: our local city-owned electric board provides (up to, customer's choice) 20gbps synchronous fiber optic to every single address it delivers power.

The reason coporations pay so much money fighting against electric co-ops (and unionized labor) is because it costs more money to offer better services — it's WORTH IT.

Congrats, SF, for finally escaping the clutches of Pacific Gas & Electric.

Don't forget the Tennessee Valley Authority.
TVA's CEO is the highest-compensated federal employee (by a significant margin) and it's because his position is worth it! We are grateful, every day, for the miracle of hydro and nuclear electric.
Yeah, the current line from the PG&E shills is that the rate hikes are justified because rural (and green) power is so expensive. It just beggars belief that anyone can say that with a straight face.
(comment deleted)