15 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 39.7 ms ] thread
Are there any inherent advantages to keeping cloud technologies closed source? Google benefited tremendously from making Kubernetes open source.
vendor lockin and price control, the recent vmware move is the perfect example of what can happen
I'm not following. Is this like kubernetes where you can run it on your own hardware or pay for it As A Service? Is it open source? (It contrasts most clouds as "But they are closed source" but I'm not seeing code?)

Edit: Docs point to https://github.com/ubicloud/ubicloud which is marked AGPL and appears to have self hosting instructions. Would have been nice to have that up front but /shrug

In an age before kubernetes, we would rent servers and VMs individually.

Cloud providers rented out this compute on top of their infrastructure.

This seems to provide a similar abstraction on top of bare metal, kind of like openstack.

Ubicloud cofounder here, thanks for the question!

You can think of Ubicloud as software that takes bare metal servers as its input, and provides VMs and other cloud infrastructure services as its output. You can self-host Ubicloud on your own hardware, or use it as a managed service.

Comments below are on point: Compared to OpenStack, Ubicloud is simpler, comes with a managed service that you can use in minutes (vs days/weeks), and provides more services such as managed databases.

Compared to Kubernetes, Ubicloud covers layers both above and below Kubernetes. For example, running K8s on AWS/Azure/GCP depends on having VMs where the pods can run on. Similarly, running a managed database service on K8s requires much more than the basic K8s service itself.

Put differently, all major cloud providers have proprietary software similar in purpose to Ubicloud, which they use to provide their core cloud services. Using AWS as an example, services like EC2, RDS for managed Postgres, or EKS for managed Kubernetes, all run on this type of software. Ubicloud makes this software open source, and allows it to run anywhere--not just on AWS data centers.

Sounds like a great value for those who don’t want to involve with k8s. As you integrate with Hetzner and their new billing system (not charging monthly anymore) is making your service more useful.
From a branding standpoint, when I saw the name, my first thought is that this was a cloud solution from Ubisoft. I'm not sure if that's a positive.
Same, and for me that's an extremely negative association.
Either that or Ubiquiti. Don't know which is worse.
Our naming intent is for a "ubiquitous" cloud, one that can run anywhere -- no affliations! :)
I directly thought about G-Core :/
$35 per month for a VPS with 2vCPU and 8GB RAM seems steep.
I think they might be using Hetzner VPS's with dedicated CPU instead of the general ones that are priced more typically.