[–] LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago ↗ No comprende. [–] rrr_oh_man 2y ago ↗ 1. Readable (reader mode)2. TranslatedChoose one :( [–] LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago ↗ When there already is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Battery , why?
[–] rrr_oh_man 2y ago ↗ 1. Readable (reader mode)2. TranslatedChoose one :( [–] LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago ↗ When there already is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Battery , why?
[–] LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago ↗ When there already is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Battery , why?
[–] KingOfCoders 2y ago ↗ Hasn't this been debunked over and over again? [–] soneca 2y ago ↗ > ”También hay quien piensa que son objetos venidos de otro mundo”Not even necessary. When you put this in evidence as an important topic of your article, you can already know it’s BS.
[–] soneca 2y ago ↗ > ”También hay quien piensa que son objetos venidos de otro mundo”Not even necessary. When you put this in evidence as an important topic of your article, you can already know it’s BS.
[–] 1attice 2y ago ↗ Why this shix, over and over?Because modern humans are _lonely_.We yearn to see a reflection in the past that we recognize.But the past and its people are strange to us, missing obvious things, obsessing over trivia.Our ancestors have become the barbies and kens through which we orphans of change attempt to understand ourselves.They aren't fit for purpose.
6 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 25.8 ms ] thread2. Translated
Choose one :(
Not even necessary. When you put this in evidence as an important topic of your article, you can already know it’s BS.
Because modern humans are _lonely_.
We yearn to see a reflection in the past that we recognize.
But the past and its people are strange to us, missing obvious things, obsessing over trivia.
Our ancestors have become the barbies and kens through which we orphans of change attempt to understand ourselves.
They aren't fit for purpose.