Not sure if this is sarcastic, but quite literally every single piece of art that Midjourney, DALL-E, etc. have been trained on was scraped without the copyright owner's consent.
Now I'm curious how many tech companies actively used questionable practices to build their foundation, then lobbied to make those practices illegal to mitigate competition. I've a feeling this is so common that they don't even see the irony in it anymore.
I read The PayPal Wars and it was wild to me how the author goes back and forth between complaining about how much regulation sucks and talking about how great it was that could take advantage of regulation in their fight about eBay.
Don't you remember the open letter for getting current AI devs to halt under some false premise while the true reasoning was to give time for the late starters to catch up?
These people have no morals, and if social media were to suddenly disappear, I think the planet and all that live on it would be better for it
The Google Search API was one of the first big Web 2.0 examples of an API. Basically every big colorful "how to do APIs" or "learn JavaScript" book in Barnes and Nobles used the Google Search API as their main example of what an API was and how useful it was until 2011 or so, when Google started turning it down.
To be fair, they didn't say that what Stability AI did was illegal, just that they didn't like it and were banning the people involved from their service.
Quite ironic for calling illegal to do what the entire business is founded upon.
And if it's a paid account (not multiple bot-created free accounts), they should have some rate limiting in place. That smeels like bad API architecture. Like basics architecture.
So they're complaining about scraping taking down MJ. I don't understand the allegations... if they're scraping things from Discord that wouldn't bring down MidJourney. The only way you'd bring down MJ would be to... use their service too much? Am I missing something?
Yeah the claims made are highly suspicious and come across as paranoid to me. If they’re saying the Midjourney discord server is being scraped - well yeah, even if it’s against your ToS, it’s so trivial to do as long as you’re invited to that server that they should just assume their competitors will and not rely on that as a competitive advantage.
And I guess that’s what it ultimately feels like - they don’t have a competitive advantage operating in the open so they’d rather whine about it than get to work making stuff.
Odd. There are a ton of of MJ datasets they seem fine with. I have a hard time believing the irony of banning scraping would be lost on them, unless it really took down their backend somehow. Oh well
40 comments
[ 0.17 ms ] story [ 159 ms ] threadIf anything, it's the epitome of hypocrisy.
Waiting for The Onion to write it. Or the NY Times; both are just as likely.
Regulation is a nice “free”* moat once you’ve made it.
*lobbying costs aside
These people have no morals, and if social media were to suddenly disappear, I think the planet and all that live on it would be better for it
If you think about it, it's kind of weird that there is no official API for Google search. They've got one for all their other products.
Also Google: we automatically enabled vignette interstitials on your website. :)
Also Google: builds tool that claims you load a bunch of JS & CSS from their ad network, thus making your own website slow
I am not sure what they expected to happen.
And if it's a paid account (not multiple bot-created free accounts), they should have some rate limiting in place. That smeels like bad API architecture. Like basics architecture.
And I guess that’s what it ultimately feels like - they don’t have a competitive advantage operating in the open so they’d rather whine about it than get to work making stuff.