Ask HN: AI projects that have hit the trifecta of Benefit, Cost and Time
Looking at many of the ongoing AI projects, I wonder if they are consistently hitting the trifecta of Cost, Time and Benefits. Even something like chatGPT is a loss maker.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chatgpt-cost-bomb-openais-losses-125101043.html
Are there any strong examples I can cite where AI has delivered/over delivered? Or majority of them vaporware?
7 comments
[ 5.0 ms ] story [ 32.9 ms ] threadFor example, all the ML involved in the image processing on modern smartphone cameras. Or ML models used to recognize and extract text from images or video. I find these things extremely useful, and with them happening on-device, there isn’t a giant hungry datacenter required to use it.
The other day I was sent a screenshot of a table in a website by my boss and needed to add information for each row. I was table to highlight it all out of the image and paste it into Excel and it required only very minor cleanup thanks to the ML. If this was 5 years ago I probably would have had to re-type it all by hand, or just hand back a much worse product.
Sure, this is just better OCR, but I find these types of things have a bunch bigger positive impact on my day-to-day life than whatever the newest AI startup is pitching.
It's not like they'll lose money forever. Some end up like telcos, just a part of the background. Some end up like FAANG, utilizing an advantage until they become rich and die from complacency. Some end up enshittifying like Twitter/X and Reddit; they hit the brakes hard to cut costs but users still don't leave.
it's turning learning and search into a compute bound problem accessibly by SWEs and DSs.