ChatGPT prompt reply copy-pasted in a published research paper (twitter.com) 14 points by shubham_saboo 2y ago ↗ HN
[–] hammock 2y ago ↗ So much for the value of peer review.I can still remember only a couple years ago when no one on HN would read your sources because they were "pre-print" and hadn't been peer reviewed
[–] bradrn 2y ago ↗ This was already posted just yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39714502
[–] typeofhuman 2y ago ↗ The reality is we've known peer-review is leaky, less we forget the Grievance studies affair[0].0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair
4 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 15.3 ms ] threadI can still remember only a couple years ago when no one on HN would read your sources because they were "pre-print" and hadn't been peer reviewed
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair